State: Washington
I recently won an arbitration judgement, (not subject to appeal), where I was awarded back pay and pension benefits, due to a wrongful termination.
The back pay and pension damage is North of $400,000.
I have not hired a lawyer yet, (and I hope I don't have to).
The union is represented by a lawyer, (the union's lawyer not mine): the employer also has a lawyer.
There is very little transparency from either the union or the employer. I have been totally transparent.
During the last face to face meeting with the union lawyer it was stated that the employer maybe "running out the clock", a conclusion I had prior to the lawyer's statement.
The Arbitrator ordered the employer to "promptly reinstate me"; and in past cases: reinstatement takes about three weeks for the new hire process, (drug and background check). It has been nine weeks and the employer doesn't want me back, and made a very small, (insulting), financial offer that I rejected.
The jurisdiction of the Arbitrator terminates in three weeks and that would be a disaster for me.
The union lawyer claims that extending the Arbitrator's jurisdiction is a matter of mutual agreement and said lawyer is confident that will happen.
I plan to meet with the union lawyer next week to provide the final installment of expenses I suffered due to the termination, (prolly only $5,000 to $10,000 of expenses), which is a small compared to the back wages and pension damage.
I think I should demand a prompt extension of the Arbitrator's authority, or it looks like I will be adversarial with both the union and the employer at great expense to me.
I was slandered and libeled by the employer's management, which is fairly easy to prove as the transcript documents the managements provably false under oath statements designed to harm me, (which was acted upon to cause the wrongful termination).
If I'm reinstated with back pay et al I will just move on; (I realize I maybe targeted as I was in the wrongful firing), but: I'm fairly sure I can weather the targeting due to the nature of the job which I perform quite well.
If I get a sufficiently large offer I will sign a NDA and move on. I'm good with either option. The company hasn't said anything other then the rediculas offer 4 weeks ago.
Please give me some input.
Thanks in advance,
ATH
I recently won an arbitration judgement, (not subject to appeal), where I was awarded back pay and pension benefits, due to a wrongful termination.
The back pay and pension damage is North of $400,000.
I have not hired a lawyer yet, (and I hope I don't have to).
The union is represented by a lawyer, (the union's lawyer not mine): the employer also has a lawyer.
There is very little transparency from either the union or the employer. I have been totally transparent.
During the last face to face meeting with the union lawyer it was stated that the employer maybe "running out the clock", a conclusion I had prior to the lawyer's statement.
The Arbitrator ordered the employer to "promptly reinstate me"; and in past cases: reinstatement takes about three weeks for the new hire process, (drug and background check). It has been nine weeks and the employer doesn't want me back, and made a very small, (insulting), financial offer that I rejected.
The jurisdiction of the Arbitrator terminates in three weeks and that would be a disaster for me.
The union lawyer claims that extending the Arbitrator's jurisdiction is a matter of mutual agreement and said lawyer is confident that will happen.
I plan to meet with the union lawyer next week to provide the final installment of expenses I suffered due to the termination, (prolly only $5,000 to $10,000 of expenses), which is a small compared to the back wages and pension damage.
I think I should demand a prompt extension of the Arbitrator's authority, or it looks like I will be adversarial with both the union and the employer at great expense to me.
I was slandered and libeled by the employer's management, which is fairly easy to prove as the transcript documents the managements provably false under oath statements designed to harm me, (which was acted upon to cause the wrongful termination).
If I'm reinstated with back pay et al I will just move on; (I realize I maybe targeted as I was in the wrongful firing), but: I'm fairly sure I can weather the targeting due to the nature of the job which I perform quite well.
If I get a sufficiently large offer I will sign a NDA and move on. I'm good with either option. The company hasn't said anything other then the rediculas offer 4 weeks ago.
Please give me some input.
Thanks in advance,
ATH