illegal arrest

[moto]

It sure did.

 

[tranquility]

When a person asks questions and gets numerous correct answers from those more knowledgable on the topic than he (for free!), and that person refuses to accept any of those answers, how should that person be treated?

 

[CdwJava]

You know how it is with some posters, Tranq, when they "know" they're right, why let the facts get in the way?

Some things just aren't so clear cut as many might wish they were.

- Carl

 

[fairisfair]

When a person asks questions and gets numerous correct answers from those more knowledgable on the topic than he (for free!), and that person refuses to accept any of those answers, how should that person be treated?

Hey what do you expect? I mean look at the answer to my post ROTFLMAO!!

 

[moto]

Some of you senior members behave like children. I asked a question and received an answer. I did not reject an answer nor comment. If you did not like my stating a fact in my case without an explanation that is your problem. If you nose is out of joint due to my not commenting you have an authority problem. Your being presumptious when you do not know any facts. Grow up we don't need immature people here. I suppose you think you are God, well you are here to help people not harass, attack and make fun. bye

 

[Curt581]

Some of you senior members behave like children. I asked a question and received an answer. I did not reject an answer nor comment. If you did not like my stating a fact in my case without an explanation that is your problem. If you nose is out of joint due to my not commenting you have an authority problem. Your being presumptious when you do not know any facts.

You are being unrealistic to the point of ignorance in expecting an accurate answer when you don't post any facts.

Grow up we don't need immature people here.

Who's "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket?

 

[Camillafarns]

Who are you? Why don't you read the original question and leave the poster alone. Ever wonder why people of intelligence do not post here? I have had the same problem with some of the members here. Ignore them.

 

[CdwJava]

Facts and details help to keep replies on track. Failure to provide certain KEY details leads to either NO replies, inaccurate replies, or frustrated attempts to reply. Most of us do not feel like publishing a treatise on the current status of statutory and case law outlining all the circumstances under which an arrest might be lawful in his state when it would be far simpler for the poster to outline the circumstances. In this case, the nature of the offense and the circumstances surrounding the officer's entry into the home would have been a HUGE help.

- Carl

 

[cepe10]

Facts and details help to keep replies on track. Failure to provide certain KEY details leads to either NO replies, inaccurate replies, or frustrated attempts to reply. Most of us do not feel like publishing a treatise on the current status of statutory and case law outlining all the circumstances under which an arrest might be lawful in his state when it would be far simpler for the poster to outline the circumstances. In this case, the nature of the offense and the circumstances surrounding the officer's entry into the home would have been a HUGE help.

- Carl

I believe it may be a strech to say the senior members being reffered to are offering "frustrated attempts at replies" - obviously they have never matured from the 6th grade level and in their delusional minds think they are funny.