FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
But is it not my right to have ivy on my exterior walls? In the event of a damage claim breaking through mortar and stucco is expensive too? Should I remove the stucco?
The insurance company wants you to remove the ivy because as it grows, it can work itself under your siding or into the mortar and damage the outside walls of your home. Also, when it grows high enough to reach the roof, it can grow under your roofing shingles and damage your roof. Let this go on long enough and have a few nice rain/snow storms, and you'll be looking at a nice big water damage problem. PLUS..once this happens, the ivy is a b*tch to remove, and the cost to do so is expensive as h*ll (and not something you can do yourself). However, you may be able to remove it yourself, if damage has not occurred yet.
Not to mention the fact that you could get some idiot who may try to CLIMB it fall and injure themselves on your property.
I guess I still haven't gotten that one right huh?
Ok, how about this: The real reason for the request was..., ..., was, ..., "to provide me, the insured, with the best possible homeowners coverage for our premium dollar" - as stated in the insurance company's letter.
Did the insurance company ever tell you specifically that the ivy was a fire hazard or did they give you some other reason? Send me an e-mail message so I can give you some options for challenging this that are too lengthy to post here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.