State of PA -- in a dispute between 2 legal advisors.
Irrevocable trust. Original grantor/trustee has resigned. Son who was listed as successor trustee was appointed.
Lawyer who did this for them provided signed notice of resignation from the original trustee and signed acceptance from the successor. The laywer claims that they do not need to be notarized because the original trust documents did not state that they had to be.
This seems wrong. Can someone elaborate on whether they need to be notarized or not.
Irrevocable trust. Original grantor/trustee has resigned. Son who was listed as successor trustee was appointed.
Lawyer who did this for them provided signed notice of resignation from the original trustee and signed acceptance from the successor. The laywer claims that they do not need to be notarized because the original trust documents did not state that they had to be.
This seems wrong. Can someone elaborate on whether they need to be notarized or not.