christichris
Junior Member
What negative consequences can come from choosing to walk away from a mortgage on a house that is falling apart and cannot be fixed? (Sold during the mortgage frenzy of 2005 - my first house)
Here are my questions:
Details:
I was sold a Lemon in June 2005 of which the owner failed to disclose that the property had a severe lack of drainage. Not only does it flood when it rains, but the foundation moves and the frame shifts due to the effect of the excess moisture on the expansive clay soil.
I put up with the mess for several years, but got married recently and would not have my wife live in that mess, so we purchased a real house and moved out.
Meanwhile, it would take over $10,000.00 to fix the deterioration that has occurred as a result of the flooding over the past 3 years in an attempt to sell the place.
I could try to sell it as is but in this market I would have to come up with at least $10K to make up for it's decrease in value due to the drainage problem - probably a lot more.
My Dad insists that the bank that made the original mortgage did not give the place a thorough appraisal and that no bank would have loaned money on it were it not for the lending frenzy that was going on at the time. He says because of that, it would not be "the end of the world" if my wife and I just mailed the keys back to the current lender and wrote letters to them and credit agencies explaining that we had to get out because the place was falling down.
We have to do something now, because we can no longer afford both mortgages.
One other option would be to go ahead and spend the $10K fixing the place, and then make it a rental - hoping the market would get better and we could sell the property 10 - 15 years down the road.
It is in an upcoming neighborhood in NE Dallas where a new rail station will open in 2010. There's a lot of urban development planned there which should increase the value of the land even if just for a tear-down to put a Mc Mansion.
Here are my questions:
- Will this ruin BOTH my credit and my wife’s for a while, or just mine? (I owned the place when we married.)
- Can the current mortgage holder come after our new property?
Details:
I was sold a Lemon in June 2005 of which the owner failed to disclose that the property had a severe lack of drainage. Not only does it flood when it rains, but the foundation moves and the frame shifts due to the effect of the excess moisture on the expansive clay soil.
I put up with the mess for several years, but got married recently and would not have my wife live in that mess, so we purchased a real house and moved out.
Meanwhile, it would take over $10,000.00 to fix the deterioration that has occurred as a result of the flooding over the past 3 years in an attempt to sell the place.
I could try to sell it as is but in this market I would have to come up with at least $10K to make up for it's decrease in value due to the drainage problem - probably a lot more.
My Dad insists that the bank that made the original mortgage did not give the place a thorough appraisal and that no bank would have loaned money on it were it not for the lending frenzy that was going on at the time. He says because of that, it would not be "the end of the world" if my wife and I just mailed the keys back to the current lender and wrote letters to them and credit agencies explaining that we had to get out because the place was falling down.
We have to do something now, because we can no longer afford both mortgages.
One other option would be to go ahead and spend the $10K fixing the place, and then make it a rental - hoping the market would get better and we could sell the property 10 - 15 years down the road.
It is in an upcoming neighborhood in NE Dallas where a new rail station will open in 2010. There's a lot of urban development planned there which should increase the value of the land even if just for a tear-down to put a Mc Mansion.
Last edited: