xylene
Senior Member
It goes from,
You lucky tenant, they could and should charge your the whole month...
to
Stop complaining. No biggy, its just a 1000 dollar fee, when the landlord never had any time without collecting rent, and the new tenant got to take possession early...
I am sorry. I didn't realize a lease and subsequent WRITTEN agreement is trumped by the "Oh that's just petty and personal" legal principle.
Let the landlord pay his own agent's fee, since it it obvious that the notice of tenant was enough to mitigate the damages he might have had. They did get to take possession early, and that said, then rest is just ordinary costs of doing business.
That's enrichment, not damages.
-----
And it doesn't matter whatever he changed his story to, or if he did at all.
He can't kept the fee for early termination after he let the new tenant take possession early.
Changing his story just reinforces how wrong he is.
You lucky tenant, they could and should charge your the whole month...
to
Stop complaining. No biggy, its just a 1000 dollar fee, when the landlord never had any time without collecting rent, and the new tenant got to take possession early...
I am sorry. I didn't realize a lease and subsequent WRITTEN agreement is trumped by the "Oh that's just petty and personal" legal principle.
Let the landlord pay his own agent's fee, since it it obvious that the notice of tenant was enough to mitigate the damages he might have had. They did get to take possession early, and that said, then rest is just ordinary costs of doing business.
That's enrichment, not damages.
-----
And it doesn't matter whatever he changed his story to, or if he did at all.
He can't kept the fee for early termination after he let the new tenant take possession early.
Changing his story just reinforces how wrong he is.
Last edited: