I originally had a Pre-trial for this past August but it was cancelled giving parties 60 days to complete discovery and leave to file dispositive motions until 11/20 for Review. I now have a pre-trial scheduled for February 1st. . . . Not sure how to prepare for this new pre-trial.
"Pre-trial" is an adjective that refers to anything that happens before a trial. When you refer to "a pre-trial," I assume you're talking about some sort of pre-trial conference. However, you didn't tell us what level of court in what state the case is pending, so there's no way for anyone here to know whether any preparation is needed. Also, you implied that a collection agency is suing you for an unpaid credit card balance, but it would be good to confirm that, tell us how much money is at issue, and tell us whether you have any valid defenses.
I never received any discovery or motions from the Plaintiff.
Does this mean the plaintiff did not serve discovery requests on you or that the plaintiff did not respond to discovery requests you served? If it's the latter, did you timely file a motion or motions to compel?
Also the only evidence they have is 2 Statements. There is no copy of Bill of Sale or any affidavits. Won't I be able to use the lack of evidence if it goes to trial?
The plaintiff has the burden of proof. A debt collector will typically call witnesses who can testify as to the authenticity of documentary evidence so that the documents can be admitted pursuant to the business records exception to the rule against hearsay. How do you know that "the only evidence [the plaintiff has] is 2 Statements"? What about witnesses? What does the reference to a bill of sale mean? Why would you expect affidavits (especially since you said the plaintiff made no motions)?
Can we reasonably assume that the plaintiff is represented by a lawyer and that you have no reason to believe the lawyer doesn't know what he/she is doing (i.e., that he/she is fully familiar with your state's rules of civil procedure and rules of evidence and the court's local rules)? How's your level of familiarity with those rules?
Won't I be able to use the lack of evidence if it goes to trial?
If the plaintiff rests its case and you don't believe it has met its initial burden, then you can move for dismissal.