single317dad
Senior Member
To me, this means:Okay, so I looked up the exact wording and here it is ...
"Each party shall pay one-half of all children related expenses, including but not limited to: daycare, pre-school, public/private school tuition, school meals, extra-curricular activities, camps, field trips, supplies for school. That the Petitioner (me) shall pay his one-half share of the school tuition directly to the school. That the children shall attend (school name) through Kindergarten at which time the parties shall attempt to meet and discuss the issue of the children's further attendance at (school name). In the event the parties cannot agree, either party may file a Petition to address said issue with the Court."
Given the above paragraph, would I still be able to stand ground on not paying past Kindergarten?
- You are responsible for half the tuition, no matter what school the children attend. That amount is payable directly to the school and not to Mom.
- That each child separately must attend the ordered school through K. At the completion of K for each child, you and Mom are to decide whether to continue in that school for that child.
- The court has made no order for the children's continuing education, except that you are to pay for half of it (and, if Mom truly has sole legal custody, that she makes the final decision, absent a court order otherwise).
- In summary, that makes a petition to the court at the conclusion of the child's Kindergarten your only opportunity for input on their continuing education, other than the check-writing part.