Ok, MY question pertains to this statement by the OP:
If this WAS a judgment and not just an old bad debt, this is a whole different can of worms. If no letter of satisfaction came from the judgment creditor and was not filed with the court, then these new debt collectors think they bought a valid judgment.
If this was NOT a judgment, then as already stated, the collector's threats regarding criminal charges are ILLEGAL. Not paying a debt is a CIVIL matter, not criminal. It DOES matter that the debt was paid, so more lies from the collector.
You need to read the FDCPA, learn your rights: http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm
Your wife's "agreement" to pay did NOT restart any SOL - if it was even applicable - from MN Statutes:
RED FLAG !!! WAS this a debt that your wife was sue for and thereby reduced to judgment ?? If so, and the payments and proof of payment you referred to were to pay a JUDGMENT, then did she ever get a LETTER OF SATISFACTION from the judgment creditor that acknowledged the judgment was paid, IN FULL (including accrued interest) ??I checked on the current SOL for MN and for judgements it is 10 years.
If this WAS a judgment and not just an old bad debt, this is a whole different can of worms. If no letter of satisfaction came from the judgment creditor and was not filed with the court, then these new debt collectors think they bought a valid judgment.
If this was NOT a judgment, then as already stated, the collector's threats regarding criminal charges are ILLEGAL. Not paying a debt is a CIVIL matter, not criminal. It DOES matter that the debt was paid, so more lies from the collector.
You need to read the FDCPA, learn your rights: http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm
Your wife's "agreement" to pay did NOT restart any SOL - if it was even applicable - from MN Statutes:
Depending on the actual character of this debt - judgment or not - you have several actions you can take, one of which is filing a complaint with your State AG for this collector's illegal actions.541.17 NEW PROMISE MUST BE IN WRITING.
No acknowledgment or promise shall be evidence of a new or continuing contract sufficient
to take the case out of the operation of this chapter unless the same is contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section shall not alter the effect of a payment of principal or interest.