CJane
Senior Member
What is the name of your state? N/A
Ok, so I'm going to admit to being trashier than I really want y'all to think I am. But I'm fascinated by the Britney/K-Fed custody thing.
This article is about that, on the surface, but it's got some great points in it, in general.
http://www.slate.com/id/2175128/nav/ais/
Ok, so I'm going to admit to being trashier than I really want y'all to think I am. But I'm fascinated by the Britney/K-Fed custody thing.
This article is about that, on the surface, but it's got some great points in it, in general.
http://www.slate.com/id/2175128/nav/ais/
Judges don't like to be ignored, and they take a particularly dim view of parents who don't seem to understand that they're supposed to be proving themselves worthy of the court's trust by cleaning up their act.
A good judge overseeing a custody dispute shouldn't care why a mother is digging her way out of the unfit pit. He should just encourage her to keep shoveling. That doesn't necessarily mean giving the kids back right away if there's real reason to worry about their physical safety. But it does mean recognizing, in some concrete way, that the parent is trying. Family courts are supposed to operate for the benefit of kids, and it's rarely in a child's interest to take him away from his mother or father for anything like forever. However exasperated they get, judges need to keep rooting for the miscreant parent.
Or maybe Gordon was showing her that you just can't defy a court order that concerns your kids. Once the law has a window into your family, you have to behave as if you're being watched.