Whyte Noise
Senior Member
What is the name of your state? Any and all
Why is it that when a non-custodial mother asks for advice, one of the first questions asked is... "Why did you lose custody anyways?"
I'm not picking on any one poster on here, as I've seen it asked numerous times... I just wonder what the reason for asking it is. I mean, when a man comes here as an NCP and asks for advice, we don't automatically ask them, "So... why did you lose custody?" do we?
I know, I'll probably get responses such as "It might play a role in advising the OP... depending on WHY they lost custody... neglect, abuse, drugs or alcohol..." etc. and that's a valid argument to some extent I suppose. But... shouldn't we be asking that of the NCP fathers that come here too? Wouldn't it help to know why THEY don't have custody? Why wouldn't we want to know if THEY abused, neglected, did drugs or alcohol, etc. like we do with the moms?
This is something that just really perturbs me. As a non-custodial mom, the stigma that comes with that label is that if a mother doesn't have custody of their children, then they must be some horrible monster that HAD to abuse, neglect, beat, deprive, or some other awful thing to not have custody. When we see/hear/advise a NC dad we don't think twice about the reason WHY he doesn't have custody, it's not even asked. But when it's a NC mom, the first thing that pops into a person's head is "Oh my God! What did she do to lose custody?!" as if a mom couldn't have possibly thought with her head and not her heart and did what was best for her children at the time, and GIVE, not "lose" custody to the father.
I have 3 children with my ex, and have been a NC mom for 4 years to 2 of them. I'm also the CP mom to 1 of them. Sometimes folks do put what their children need above what they want. It happens. And in the past 4 years, most of the NC mothers I have met, spoken with, and associated with didn't "lose" custody because they were Joan Crawford clones or CPS's worst nightmare come true. They realized that what was in their children's best interest was somethng they couldn't give them at the time, so the children went with the parent that could. That's what happened in my case as well.
It just seems like a double standard to me. Yes, it's not the norm for a mom to not have custody, and yes sometimes they don't have custody because of neglect, abuse, and other issues. But... is it fair to them to automatically assume something like that, and question them about why they don't have custody? I don't think it is. Or... if it IS fair, then we should also be questioning the fathers as to why they don't have custody as well because something had to have happened for them to not have custody too. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
OK, I'm done. Just had to get that out.
Why is it that when a non-custodial mother asks for advice, one of the first questions asked is... "Why did you lose custody anyways?"
I'm not picking on any one poster on here, as I've seen it asked numerous times... I just wonder what the reason for asking it is. I mean, when a man comes here as an NCP and asks for advice, we don't automatically ask them, "So... why did you lose custody?" do we?
I know, I'll probably get responses such as "It might play a role in advising the OP... depending on WHY they lost custody... neglect, abuse, drugs or alcohol..." etc. and that's a valid argument to some extent I suppose. But... shouldn't we be asking that of the NCP fathers that come here too? Wouldn't it help to know why THEY don't have custody? Why wouldn't we want to know if THEY abused, neglected, did drugs or alcohol, etc. like we do with the moms?
This is something that just really perturbs me. As a non-custodial mom, the stigma that comes with that label is that if a mother doesn't have custody of their children, then they must be some horrible monster that HAD to abuse, neglect, beat, deprive, or some other awful thing to not have custody. When we see/hear/advise a NC dad we don't think twice about the reason WHY he doesn't have custody, it's not even asked. But when it's a NC mom, the first thing that pops into a person's head is "Oh my God! What did she do to lose custody?!" as if a mom couldn't have possibly thought with her head and not her heart and did what was best for her children at the time, and GIVE, not "lose" custody to the father.
I have 3 children with my ex, and have been a NC mom for 4 years to 2 of them. I'm also the CP mom to 1 of them. Sometimes folks do put what their children need above what they want. It happens. And in the past 4 years, most of the NC mothers I have met, spoken with, and associated with didn't "lose" custody because they were Joan Crawford clones or CPS's worst nightmare come true. They realized that what was in their children's best interest was somethng they couldn't give them at the time, so the children went with the parent that could. That's what happened in my case as well.
It just seems like a double standard to me. Yes, it's not the norm for a mom to not have custody, and yes sometimes they don't have custody because of neglect, abuse, and other issues. But... is it fair to them to automatically assume something like that, and question them about why they don't have custody? I don't think it is. Or... if it IS fair, then we should also be questioning the fathers as to why they don't have custody as well because something had to have happened for them to not have custody too. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
OK, I'm done. Just had to get that out.