My SIL has a combination of scholarships and private loans that cover her tuition and books. Her parents then took out the PLUS loans to pay her room and board. When my SIL moved out of the dorms and into an apartment, they started keeping the PLUS loan money for themselves instead of paying her rent. They are supposed to send a check to her landlord, and I believe have cosigned on the lease, but I"ll have to double check the second part. I know they cosigned on her first apartment, but I don't know for certain if they did on the current one.If the parents are paying her tuition and even SOME of her rent, then there is no fraud. The parent loan is reimbursing them for what they paid for her tuition.
Are the parents cosigned on her lease? Do they send checks to her landlord? Are they supposed to send her money so that she pays the rent herself? Not many people will rent to a college student without a cosigner, that means if the rent doesn't get paid the landlord is going to sue them for it. What exactly is the arrangement?
Entirely possible, and in fact highly likely. My SIL's a smart kid but she's only 20.I suspect some of the details are being lost in the relating of her problems to the third party (OP).
Well, actually, not everyone has said that. I will bet my last dollar that everyone will agree that you, as an uninvolved third party, are not privy to the facts. As such, my advice to you is to tell your SIL that if she wants help, she ought to sign up with her own account and ask her questions.From what everyone says, it sounds to me like their personal use of the PLUS loan money is indeed considered fraudulent. What can be done about that?
I surely didn't say that. I said there might be a possibility of that. That is an issue between the borrower and the lender. I am not privy to their contract so I cannot say what stipulations are placed on the loan.From what everyone says, it sounds to me like their personal use of the PLUS loan money is indeed considered fraudulent. What can be done about that?
Thank you.IF it is fraud and IF something is done about it, the end result is that the government will take the loan money back and force her parents to pay the loan back immediately and prevent them from taking out any more loans. None of which will help her in the slightest way to pay her rent.
That's all well and good but does anybody really want to be involved in a person simply wanting to be a tattle tale because the parents are not assisting their child as OP believes they should be?http://www.direct.ed.gov/parent.html
It appears one requirement is the money be used to pay for student expenses at their school. See last paragraph in government link.
Does she have any sort of legal recourse for getting her parents to use her loans for her living expenses?
Just presenting the law. I don't have a dog in this fight.That's all well and good but does anybody really want to be involved in a person simply wanting to be a tattle tale because the parents are not assisting their child as OP believes they should be?
Sure what the parents are doing is wrong but it, in itself, does not affect OP or OP's friend. In the end, this seems to be about retribution more than concern for the action itself. I do have a problem with that.
Remember, this is what OP said:
actually, neither does OP or in reality, OP's SIL.Just presenting the law. I don't have a dog in this fight.
I don't.I can't believe you endorse student loan fraud.