PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI?

[Jameson]

I know I am posting in the right thread! This is for Constitution Tax advice. I have Supreme Court case coming up. I need help with preparing a PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI! Does anyone have knowledge? You cannot give me legal advice without being attorney. With that said, does anyone have knowledge about preparation of said PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI? Please NO CRAZIES!

 

[not2cleverRed]

Is this related to some of your previous posts?

https://forum.freeadvice.com/threads/edwards-v-keith-231-f-110-2nd-cir-1916.654110/#post-3628840

 

[Jameson]

In a way yes... I know what I am doing. This is a long shot finding someone who is not crazy and knowledge.

 

[Zigner]

I know I am posting in the right thread! This is for Constitution Tax advice. I have Supreme Court case coming up. I need help with preparing a PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI! Does anyone have knowledge? You cannot give me legal advice without being attorney. With that said, does anyone have knowledge about preparation of said PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI? Please NO CRAZIES!

I'm aware of only one posting in this thread...

 

[Ohiogal]

The idea that the Supreme Court is going to hear your case is astronomical. You are not going to get a Writ based upon what you have posted.

 

[Zigner]

Look - you're not going to get help here - your belief that the federal tax laws are unconstitutional is crazy.

 

[Ohiogal]

And I am an attorney. You don't know what you are doing. That is a fact.

 

[Ohiogal]

Edwards v. Keith in its entirety from the US Supreme Court:

243 U.S. 638 (1917)



37 S.Ct. 402, 61 L.Ed. 942



CHARLES JEROME EDWARDS, Petitioner,



v.



HENRY P. KEITH, as Collector of Internal Revenue, etc.



No. 866.



United States Supreme Court.



March 12, 1917


COUNSEL

Mr. Meier Steinbrink for petitioner.

Mr. Solicitor General Davis and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for respondent.

OPINION

Denied.

 

[Jameson]

The idea that the Supreme Court is going to hear your case is astronomical. You are not going to get a Writ based upon what you have posted.

Look! It has already been done and the lower courts are still avoiding the facts! Read this and then talk please! No disrespect! Must read! https://www.scribd.com/document/113627276/U-S-Supreme-Court-IRS-Case-IRS-in-Default-All-documents-Thru-motion-for-ORDER Download it and cancel the trail they will cancel the 30 day without issues.

 

[Jameson]

Edwards v. Keith in its entirety from the US Supreme Court:

243 U.S. 638 (1917)



37 S.Ct. 402, 61 L.Ed. 942



CHARLES JEROME EDWARDS, Petitioner,



v.



HENRY P. KEITH, as Collector of Internal Revenue, etc.



No. 866.



United States Supreme Court.



March 12, 1917


COUNSEL

Mr. Meier Steinbrink for petitioner.

Mr. Solicitor General Davis and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for respondent.

OPINION

Denied.

Ok! Great! Please give me the link to where you have read this? This is what I am looking for!

 

[Jameson]

Edwards v. Keith in its entirety from the US Supreme Court:

243 U.S. 638 (1917)



37 S.Ct. 402, 61 L.Ed. 942



CHARLES JEROME EDWARDS, Petitioner,



v.



HENRY P. KEITH, as Collector of Internal Revenue, etc.



No. 866.



United States Supreme Court.



March 12, 1917


COUNSEL

Mr. Meier Steinbrink for petitioner.

Mr. Solicitor General Davis and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for respondent.

OPINION

Denied.

I am now getting it confirmed. If you’re an attorney then you can give me the full case.... email it to me please. [email address removed]

 

[not2cleverRed]

Ok! Great! Please give me the link to where you have read this? This is what I am looking for!

Um, you do understand that when a petition is "denied" that the petitioner lost, right?