I understand that he is an expert trained in this. To note, he couldn't have used his vehicle to pace me because he was parked on the side of the road. So he either used estimation or radar.
I only have to provide reasonable doubt, right? While he may be an expert, he is just human and humans make mistakes. Would the facts that there was dense fog and my car is light gray, almost the same color as the fog be enough to create reasonable doubt? That's assuming that he used estimation of course.
If he testifies that he used radar, I'll have to attack the accuracy/callibration/his training.
I only have to provide reasonable doubt, right? While he may be an expert, he is just human and humans make mistakes. Would the facts that there was dense fog and my car is light gray, almost the same color as the fog be enough to create reasonable doubt? That's assuming that he used estimation of course.
If he testifies that he used radar, I'll have to attack the accuracy/callibration/his training.