• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Please help This Dad

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

acmb05

Senior Member
I agree with you

brisgirl825 said:
Sorry once again, as I forgot to add "no" Cos involved. I am not having a good typing day...

He has the right to use any money, NOT COed as leverage, which he has done in order to get what he wanted.

I am not assuming he wanted nothing to do with the child. I simply stated that he did not go through with his promise to be involved. It was his choice but he cannot expect mom to be appreciative of that.

It seems as though both party's have made mistakes in this situation. I realize, as a male, it is easy for you to blame this all on mom but your bias does the OP no good. It is better for him to see his mistakes, in order to understand where mom is coming from, and vise versa. However mom is not here to be told that.
I think they both made mistakes. However from just his post it seems to me that he is trying and she is fighting him every step of the way.He seems to have faced what he did wrong and is now trying to rectify it. Of course we dont know the whole story only his side. I would be willing to bet hers is completely different.
 


Shay-Pari'e

Senior Member
acmb05 said:
And as I have been told many times. Keep your opinion out of it. This is a legal forum not a message board to voice your personal opinions on matters.
He had a paternity test done and was found to be the father. So no matter what he did in the past he has a right to go to court and get visitation.

Btw he wanted nothing to do with the mother, he wants a relationship with the child. It's the mother who is being unreasonable.
Back off buddy! Seems you are the one spouting off opinions, I was replying to the facts.
 

clf495

Member
i agree they are both fighting cooperation. Ihave to say, the father is being a little inconsiderate though and i think every mother would feel the same. Pit469 doesnt seem very compasionate
 
I disagree... I think he is being very compassionate considering that the mother is doing what she is doing. He is makeing the attempts and she isn't acknoledging that and fighting him************** I give him a thumbs up for trying as hard as he is.
 

AHA

Senior Member
And think how easily all this would have been avoided with a cheap little thing called CONDOM!

If only people used the head on their shoulders instead of the one between their legs every once in a while, what a better world it would be for many kids out there.

Now, go ahead and slam me all you want. Bottom line is, truth hurts.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
BelizeBreeze said:
Mississippi allows for retroactive child support. For how long is at the discretion of the court.


In any event, support is ordered from the filing of the ORIGINAL action. Therefore, it now matters not when the case is revived or a new action if filed. The date of the original action will control for the assignment of support arrears, plus any retroactive support before that date to the birth of the child which may be assessed.
Did you not read my post from yesterday?

That is the reality. Nothing else matters in this thread except the law. And the law is NOT on your friend's side.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top