BelizeBreeze
Senior Member
And she would play hell trying to prove such an 'invasion' since she ADVERTISES.Quaere said:Foxylady,
These people are going to be walking a very fine line when using this strategy. The threats are more related to invasion of privacy or intentional infliction of emotional distress claims than to defamation.
An intentional tort requires intent to injure. And again, she advertises the fact that she is an escort. There is no injury where the aggrieved party participates in the notification.You need to find an attorney who specializes in such claims or who has at least had some direct experience with such intentional torts. I don't believe that any of the posters who have added to this thread, have actual experience in this area.
You keep doing your research. And when you learn a little about the law of Intentional Tort and invasion of privacy, come back and let us know what you've learned.I may do a little research for you over the weekend so check back here in a few days. If I can't find any more info for you I'll at least post THAT fact by Sunday night.