That's a very good point except how many times is a judge going to rule against solid video evidence before he (or she) is removed from the bench?So the taxpayers will put out the enormous cost of buying, maintaining, and enforcing the wearing of these headcams, but the decision of what is valid conduct or not will rest with an arbitrary judge? Of course, it will be agreed upon ahead of time that all judges are impartial? Tell me, what happens if some day you disagree with the judge's decision?
Last edited: