mistoffolees
Senior Member
Just to clarify: I'm not saying that it's not an issue and that a court couldn't bar the change on those grounds. Just that the discussion needs to be based on fact and not prejudice or pre-conceived notions. If OP goes into court and says "the school will force my child to learn the Catholic faith" and that turns out not to be true for that particular school, OP would look like an idiot - and possibly lose the case.The Pope will be quite surprised to hear that as Pope John Paul II gave an updated Catechism to the faithful as recently as 1992. I think the Vatican still expects the American Catholic churches to teach the faith as defined by the Church. (You may be thinking of the pre-Vatican II Catechism, which is, of course, gone.)
In all my years of Catholic schooling as a pupil, a parent and a teacher, I have never seen a school that did not require daily religious instruction which focused on teaching children the faith.
Since I have not seen all of the Catholic schools in the country, I will have to accept your assertation that there are Catholic schools that do not require religious instruction.
OP - you'd need to check with the specific Catholic school in question to see how they operate.
Furthermore, the fact that the religion issue wasn't brought up until considerably later suggests that it's not that big a deal (whether it is or not).
I agree that the court is not likely to require the kids to switch schools based on the information given, but am simply stating that putting too much emphasis on the religion element distracts from legal arguments that are at least as good. Present the religion concerns, but do not count on them winning the day by themselves.