Protective order against a minor?

[Florid-aise]

I am somewhat surprised at the posts being made here. On multiple fronts. First and foremost, I know of no State's child protection services that would refuse to act (or react) to child-on-child molestation. Which is paramount that in this case, you follow rmet4nzkx's suggestion, immediately, if not sooner.

You may not know or understand the principle of law here, but the laws and rights of persons apply to persons of tender age as well, thus, a Guardian Ad Litem will stand in the place of the tender age children if the Guardian performs their task properly, as in this case I would hope and pray would be the posterboy scenario. The Guardian is the eyes and ears of the court, where and when the court cannot go, and cannot see. Completely independant of any other party in any other suit. The Guardian stands alone. And has access directly to the court to report, request, file motions, and to by God, act; whether the mother or father ever do. Now is the time for someone to do precisely that, unquestionably.

Squabble here all you want to, but do nothing but find a solution, and stop at nothing until that solution is found.

Next, in a very intense self-inspection, weighing ALL of those factors deemed worthy of consideration, contact the press if need be. There is not one governmental agency that can withstand such public scrutiny, most especially a child protection team, brought out into the spotlight for failing to take "jurisdiction" on an issue as volatle as the one you are describing.

 

[stealth2]

The solution is, IMO, simple. Protect my child and tell b/f to help his. And in the meantime to move out. OP doesn't like that solution. Oh well.

 

[Florid-aise]

The solution is, IMO, simple. Protect my child and tell b/f to help his. And in the meantime to move out. OP doesn't like that solution. Oh well.

Your argument is completely infalable, and without doubt a solution, albeit, the best and most immediate solution, and one which should be highly considered. Reunion with the b/f at a later date can be had once both sensative parties have retreated to separate corners during the repair.

On the issue of a Guardian Ad Litem, IMO; would still remain the better practice; even if - and even while, there is an on-going divorce; and even if - and even while "retreating to nuetral corners" during the repair.