demurringdude
Member
You don't get to see any judges at all when you petition for a writ - they do it all in private, from the documents you submit. But it is an interesting and educational experience nonetheless.Tomorrow I'm going to try requesting the written proceedings of the arraignment, and then file for a... writ of mandate... right?
How do I ask for the writ of mandate? In writing or orally? In court or with the clerk or DA?
If that doesn't work I'll move to dismiss when my trial comes in late January, but I wanna try this first--I wanna see as many judges as possible.
I am all in favor of people taking advantage of their rights like this. But I will caution you that there is a fair bit of work involved in a petition. You have to do it in writing at the Appellate Division for the court you appeared at. Most courts require you to do it on a form APP-151 which you can download on the internet. You fill that out, assemble it in a binder with all your other documents and rulings, and make copies in a certain format with correct tabs etc etc. It's a pain. One problem you will have right away is that you will need a written ruling from the lower court showing that your request to be heard on a demurrer was denied. You will have a problem getting that, since that is not what they recorded. I don't know how you would get around that.
What you will be claiming is that the judge did not hear your demurrer. You will be asking the Appellate Division to instruct the judge to hear your demurrer. If you are successful (which is likely), the judge will be so instructed, and you will be back in front of him for a demurrer hearing. That kind of puts you back where you started, because the judge may well hear your demurrer and deny it. Then you will be going to trial anyway (unless you fancy another petition).
The demurrer hearing that you get would be very similar to the hearing you would get at trial on a motion to dismiss. You would be introducing evidence that the ticket was late, and arguing points of law. The outcome is likely to be similar in either setting - I don't think the judge cares too much whether you call it a demurrer hearing or a motion to dismiss hearing, to him it's pretty much the same issue - is the ticket valid or not.
For that reason, I think the smarter move is to just go to trial. It's pretty much the same conversation with the same judge, but it's way less work. The petition is really time-consuming, whereas at trial you just have to show up and start talking.
If I have not talked you out of the petition, I would be happy to help you with it. I can send you copies of mine, which would give you an idea what is involved.