LdiJ
Senior Member
While I agree with this in theory, its VERY unlikely in OP's case. Dad has chosen to be a contractor in Iraq for most of the child's life, therefore he is a virtual stranger to the child. On top of that, when he did return to the states he chose to live on the other side of the country. No matter what mom does at this point, unless she poses an actual, physical danger to the child, dad doesn't have a hope in heck of winning custody.Your rights--and his--will be established when all this goes to court. You will be required to provide whatever that court order says you must provide. I think it's a pretty safe bet that that's going to be a lot more than what you want, but you're not going to have a choice. If he can demonstrate that you are not a cooperative co-parent, he could even be awarded physical custody.
If she doesn't cooperate after there are court orders, then she would be at risk of losing custody.
It could have some bearing on dad's willingness to actually follow through with a case.Your perception of his past indifference is contradicted by his current desire to communicate with his son, and what you "feel" about his intentions are not going to matter. His relationship with his other son is going to have no bearing on this.
I am not looking at this case as a mother vs a father...and I don't think she is either. I am looking at this case as a custodial parent vs a parent who has chosen to be absent for almost the child's entire life, now trying to make demands upon the other parent, instead of simply doing the right thing and taking it to court.You might want to start getting used to the idea that a mother isn't more of a parent than a father is. Even if that father walked out on his marriage. You have to separate your bitterness and resentment from what is realistically practical and accept that it is not within your power to make him "pay" for what he's done. He's allowed to leave you, and that doesn't require him to lose his status as a father.
Again, in this case I honestly don't think it matters. All she needs to have on her list is that he chose to be a contractor in Iraq for almost the child's entire life, and then chose to move to the other side of the country when he returned...and that therefore he is a stranger to the child. When he brings up his attempts at communication via the telephone and web, all mom has to say is "the child is 2 1/2, the child isn't old enough to be able to communicate well via telephone and the web, let alone develop a relationship."When you walk into court you want to be able to present a long list of things you have done to facilitate the relationship between your son and his father. You do not want the father to have a list of things you've done to interfere with that.