HawaiianBurger
Junior Member
My response was abrupt and without tempo - my apologies.Huh?
I understand what you want, I don't understand how you want it from this statement.
For one, I found your statement of requiring some interaction of church and state in order to have "inalienable" rights to be false, if my interpretation is correct. Yes, I would say to some degree that rights given to us in scripture are fundamental, and I agree with them. I like to have these rights. To say their origin lies in solely in religion is ludicrous. To exclude religion, however, seems to exclude these rights (simple they are - I'll just say they make up morality) by your reasoning. Again, I may be wrong in my interpretation. Also ecmst12 discussed the definition of "creator" which you use and I have specified from general form here.
The last bit was just for example. Let's say we adopt the first commandment into law, punishing by death those who worship another god. Have we not effectively factored "freedom of religion" or "right to worship as you will" from the list of "inalienable" rights? Just a consequence of mixing a little church and state...
Last edited: