How OP presents herself to the court can absolutely affect the decisions made.
It was asserted by some here,that because she knew of his history but went ahead regardless and had his baby and married him
somehow affected her present assertion that he is posing danger to the child,in a way that would negate such claim (kinda...o yeah ...you knew all this before...and you were ok with it....all of the sudden you try to claim otherwise....
and because you were ok with it all this time....you can not claim now that he is danger to the child)
BUT!!
There is a gap.
You did not ,and you can't,explain,how her knowing all that,and going along with it all this time,
negated the possibility that he can be danger to the child,and has been ,potentially,all this time.
Why,because she knew all this before,means that she can't bring claim that the child is in danger,seniors?