L
Lisa Davis
Guest
What is the name of your state? OH
In brief, received Summons in Civil Action for ASSet Acceptance trying to collect on an SoL account (DLA 9/96). Submitted papers in response on August 18, 2003 that I was standing on expired SoL of this debt (4yrs. in Ohio). Also sent copies to ASSet CRRR.
ASSet claims they sent "discovery (including Requests for Admissions) on Defendant on September 3, 2003 without resonse."
November 6, 2003 ASSet filed a Motion for Leave to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. (I did not receive a copy of this November 13, 2003)
November 17, 2003 I hand delivered a correspondence to the court in response to their attempt to gain Summary Judgment. At that time I found that on November 13, 2003 this "judge" had already granted ASSet the Motion for Leave!!!!!!!
It was my mistake that my correspondence was not formatted & worded as a "Motion". At any rate, ASSet clearly has seen the handwriting on the wall on the SoL and is purposely trying to deter from appearing on the Pretrial date (December 23, 2003). What do I need to do and how do I need to enter it/format it to enter it as a Motion? What do I need to do next to deter ASSet from arm-twisting a judge (who has been voted out of office and is due to leave MID-December at the latest) into a Summary Judgment?
In brief, received Summons in Civil Action for ASSet Acceptance trying to collect on an SoL account (DLA 9/96). Submitted papers in response on August 18, 2003 that I was standing on expired SoL of this debt (4yrs. in Ohio). Also sent copies to ASSet CRRR.
ASSet claims they sent "discovery (including Requests for Admissions) on Defendant on September 3, 2003 without resonse."
November 6, 2003 ASSet filed a Motion for Leave to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. (I did not receive a copy of this November 13, 2003)
November 17, 2003 I hand delivered a correspondence to the court in response to their attempt to gain Summary Judgment. At that time I found that on November 13, 2003 this "judge" had already granted ASSet the Motion for Leave!!!!!!!
It was my mistake that my correspondence was not formatted & worded as a "Motion". At any rate, ASSet clearly has seen the handwriting on the wall on the SoL and is purposely trying to deter from appearing on the Pretrial date (December 23, 2003). What do I need to do and how do I need to enter it/format it to enter it as a Motion? What do I need to do next to deter ASSet from arm-twisting a judge (who has been voted out of office and is due to leave MID-December at the latest) into a Summary Judgment?