tigger22472
Senior Member
LdiJ said:I have to disagree with that. Its really the opposite. Joint legal custody is very much the norm (joint decision making) and more people are getting some form of joint physical custody, but its not to the stage at all where its "nearly everyone". It is for joint legal custody, but not joint physical.
Imagine that, you disagree with me, who would have thunk it. I'm not sure you're need to try quoting me and calling me out when I have tried to make sure not to do the same to you to end this disagreement but obviously you want the drama. At any rate, joint physical does not have to mean equal time. My papers said joint physical and sole legal and all my ex had was standard visitation according the guidelines, so, I do disagree with your assessment.
Now, to the OP. The point of the matter is that dad has these rights and they have been signed by a judge. There is nothing you have said that would warrant the judge changing that decision. You would have to have proof that dad doesn't deserve joint custody and nothing you have said warrants that. You will end up going in and ticking off this judge. If you live in a small town where all the proceedings are handled by the same judge he/she will remember you if you keep taking petty things to him/her so when something serious does come up you will have be required to have a higher burden of proof.