• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Tenant needs help PLEASE

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.


EdKam

Junior Member
You do not have to read them do you? Have you nothing better to do? I was unfortunately under the impression these boards might attempt to help a person in need. I was apparently wrong. Everyone should hire an attorney? Then what is the purpose of this board? To critic and humiliate people? Ah yes that is the basic concept of the average person on line, hiding behind a computer screen. My questions as they pertain to the law have NOT been answered. Let us get back to germane issues. Attempting to "kill" a thread is NOT in the best interest of this board.Sincerely, I do not think many people are reading what has been written. NOW:
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B. They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD?
 

south

Senior Member
Go ahead hire an attorney, by posting your particular problem here you may very well have saved some bucks that could be used for such things as packing boxes.

And your right; most of us here have nothing better to do than give free tips advice to others from personal or legal experience, its a thankless infectious task but someone has to do it. :rolleyes:

The company does not want to renew your lease, chin up move along soldier.





EdKam said:
You do not have to read them do you? Have you nothing better to do? I was unfortunately under the impression these boards might attempt to help a person in need. I was apparently wrong. Everyone should hire an attorney? Then what is the purpose of this board? To critic and humiliate people? Ah yes that is the basic concept of the average person on line, hiding behind a computer screen. My questions as they pertain to the law have NOT been answered. Let us get back to germane issues. Attempting to "kill" a thread is NOT in the best interest of this board.Sincerely, I do not think many people are reading what has been written. NOW:
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B. They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD?
 

EdKam

Junior Member
Thank you for another wasted non compliant response to a question. I agree there exist a nexus of wannabe legal beagles, that need to shut up when they have nothing to add except negativity and insults. The Internet is loaded with such beings. This board appears to be no different and is not monitored with the jurisprudence that should be applied. Now lets get back to the real question, shall we?
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B.) They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD?
 

south

Senior Member
EdKam your a friggin riot LMAO

You start your posts with a volley of insults then demand an answer to another question..

Hit the road Jack.....




EdKam said:
Thank you for another wasted non compliant response to a question. I agree there exist a nexus of wannabe legal beagles, that need to shut up when they have nothing to add except negativity and insults. The Internet is loaded with such beings. This board appears to be no different and is not monitored with the jurisprudence that should be applied. Now lets get back to the real question, shall we?
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B.) They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD?
 

ENASNI

Senior Member
south said:
EdKam your a friggin riot LMAO

You start your posts with a volley of insults then demand an answer to another question..

Hit the road Jack.....
And don't ya come back no mo' no mo' no mo' no mo'
 

EdKam

Junior Member
If you genuinely feel I am a riot and am here to entertain and baby-sit, you are sadly mistaken. Tis true I have an affinity with human rights and the laws that are supposed to protect consumers. I have not insulted anyone on this thread. I have been insulted with non compliant answers to legitimate legal questions. My questions regarding my sister's lease and the paragraphs listed have not been answered. However, it is quite apparent that no one with actual knowledge of the tenant landlord law of my State has read my questions. People such as yourself only distract from getting a professional response to a question through intimidation or humiliation of the poster. This is a sad and immoral manner of conduct. I would send you to your room but likely you haven't been out of it for many years. Now that's a riot! LMAO
HOW ABOUT A REAL RESPONSE?
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B.) They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD? :rolleyes:
 

south

Senior Member
You have been answered but it sounds like you may have selective vision.

The company does not want to renew the lease and do not have to.

If the tenant does not move at the end of the time given on the notice then the owners can file to evict.

Does the contract state anywhere that it automaticaly renewes for another WHOLE YEAR if neither party gives notice within 60 days of the expiration of the end of the lease? if not it turns to a month to month and the owner can give notice to leave.

And yes the owner should give you written notice to leave.





EdKam said:
If you genuinely feel I am a riot and am here to entertain and baby-sit, you are sadly mistaken. Tis true I have an affinity with human rights and the laws that are supposed to protect consumers. I have not insulted anyone on this thread. I have been insulted with non compliant answers to legitimate legal questions. My questions regarding my sister's lease and the paragraphs listed have not been answered. However, it is quite apparent that no one with actual knowledge of the tenant landlord law of my State has read my questions. People such as yourself only distract from getting a professional response to a question through intimidation or humiliation of the poster. This is a sad and immoral manner of conduct. I would send you to your room but likely you haven't been out of it for many years. Now that's a riot! LMAO
HOW ABOUT A REAL RESPONSE?
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B.) They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD? :rolleyes:
 

longneck

Member
post ALL of paragraph 16 from the lease agreement last in force (NOT the lease agreement signed only by your sister).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top