If you genuinely feel I am a riot and am here to entertain and baby-sit, you are sadly mistaken. Tis true I have an affinity with human rights and the laws that are supposed to protect consumers. I have not insulted anyone on this thread. I have been insulted with non compliant answers to legitimate legal questions. My questions regarding my sister's lease and the paragraphs listed have not been answered. However, it is quite apparent that no one with actual knowledge of the tenant landlord law of my State has read my questions. People such as yourself only distract from getting a professional response to a question through intimidation or humiliation of the poster. This is a sad and immoral manner of conduct. I would send you to your room but likely you haven't been out of it for many years. Now that's a riot! LMAO
HOW ABOUT A REAL RESPONSE?
I quote directly from her rental agent the following: "Paragraph 16 indicates that if the lease is not going to be renewed, one of the parties must give 60 days notice to vacate, 60 days prior to the end of the lease on the 1st day of the month. Neither you nor the owner have given notice to vacate".....OK, therefore notification had to have been made on March 1, 2005. It was not until April 26, 2005, that anything about rescinding the new lease took place. B.) They will NOT cash her check as indicated in previous board postings for the rent of April. Obviously they see the legal dilemma if they do.
So they are refusing payment as submitted. On what grounds are they going to eventually evict her on if the owner never signs the new lease? IMO they are directing this case to a judge. He is going to look at all the e-mails and see all the lies and deceptive attempts made. Proving retaliation is not going to be that hard. ARE THERE ANY JUST AND TRUE ATTORNIES THAT READ THIS BOARD?