justalayman
Senior Member
That really isn't his decision. He placed arbitrary rules on her visitation that a court can't usually impose (not won't but actually can't). A parent does not have to have a job to be entitled to visitation. A parent generally cannot be denied visitation based on child support delinquency. A parent most certainly will not be denied visitation based on their commitment to remain in a particular state (that's a really big no no as in a constitutional rights violation) and having a home can play a part in visitation, there are cases where people that lived in their cars successfully fought for visitation.He wanted to see that she wasn't going to abandon her daughter again. We feel like all of those requests are very basic adult functions that shouldn't have to be asked of her. She abandoned her daughter for 11 months of her own choice because she would rather party and spend time with her boyfriend and friends. What could 2 more months hurt to ensure that she wasn't going to run off. I'm going to repeat again that she was living in a crack house and doing meth. It is the fathers job to look out for his daughters best interest. She received no visitation rights so he was not violating any court order. The mother agreed to all of the terms you say are unfair when he talked to her about it. She claimed it to be reasonable and promised she would do it. Again I'm going to say that she got a home and did not even ask to see her daughter. Her effort was very minimal. I've read enough laws on this to know that minimal effort can also be considered abandonment. All she had to do was stay in touch and show effort. Instead she did drugs and would fail to message him for weeks tocmomths at a time. There was a time she didn't message him for 2 months despite him messaging her to check in. Why can a father not protect his own daughter? Even if it is from the biological mother?