North Carolina.
Good morning, all.
I have a separate thread where I asked a question about the legality of time-shaving and my refusal to do it. Well, the result of that has been (I am 99% sure) that I have been terminated for refusing to falsify time cards in order to reduce overtime.
So, now that I've been terminated I have a question about unemployment insurance. When I asked why I was being terminated, the manager mumbled something about the home office being unhappy with the way I was doing invoices. My problem with that is, I had no control over "how" invoices were done. Without going into all the detail of how the system worked, I'll just say that there was really only one way to do the invoices, and that's how I did it. The only wiggle-room was exactly how much was going to be invoiced, and that wasn't my decision. Even if there could have been errors on my part, I received absolutely no feedback or complaints until I was terminated. I was never told I was doing anything wrong--in fact, I was consistently praised for the quality of my work. If they had chosen a more subjective reason for my termination I could understand, but this reason simply does not make sense. That--and the timing--is why I believe it's because I refused to submit payroll in violation of state law. But, for practical purposes, that part is beside the point. I've been terminated and the only thing I have to work with is the complaint about the invoicing.
The issue I'm trying to deal with now is the reason for termination which I must choose on the online application for UI. Unsatisfactory work is the official reason, but that seems to have raised some red flags in the UI system (for justifiable reasons, I know). Parts of the process aren't really clear, and I'm not sure when I go into all of the "I did my job to the best of my ability" thing that commentator recommends. Do I simply submit it as-is, wait to see if the company opposes my claim, and go into all of that at the hearing? Or, do I submit a document with the initial claim (there is a mechanism for submitting documents)? I want to do everything as correctly as I can from the beginning.
Thanks for your attention and any advice you can offer.
Good morning, all.
I have a separate thread where I asked a question about the legality of time-shaving and my refusal to do it. Well, the result of that has been (I am 99% sure) that I have been terminated for refusing to falsify time cards in order to reduce overtime.
So, now that I've been terminated I have a question about unemployment insurance. When I asked why I was being terminated, the manager mumbled something about the home office being unhappy with the way I was doing invoices. My problem with that is, I had no control over "how" invoices were done. Without going into all the detail of how the system worked, I'll just say that there was really only one way to do the invoices, and that's how I did it. The only wiggle-room was exactly how much was going to be invoiced, and that wasn't my decision. Even if there could have been errors on my part, I received absolutely no feedback or complaints until I was terminated. I was never told I was doing anything wrong--in fact, I was consistently praised for the quality of my work. If they had chosen a more subjective reason for my termination I could understand, but this reason simply does not make sense. That--and the timing--is why I believe it's because I refused to submit payroll in violation of state law. But, for practical purposes, that part is beside the point. I've been terminated and the only thing I have to work with is the complaint about the invoicing.
The issue I'm trying to deal with now is the reason for termination which I must choose on the online application for UI. Unsatisfactory work is the official reason, but that seems to have raised some red flags in the UI system (for justifiable reasons, I know). Parts of the process aren't really clear, and I'm not sure when I go into all of the "I did my job to the best of my ability" thing that commentator recommends. Do I simply submit it as-is, wait to see if the company opposes my claim, and go into all of that at the hearing? Or, do I submit a document with the initial claim (there is a mechanism for submitting documents)? I want to do everything as correctly as I can from the beginning.
Thanks for your attention and any advice you can offer.