• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Urgent Request For Help, Part 2

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

What is the name of your state?WA

I was asked to apply for GAL. It appears to be an investigative position for the court. Is this something I qualify for?
 


Your situation seems more fitting to me then some. i would request it and see. It may depend on availabilty and a list of other factors. But it doesn't hurt to ask. As for why they closed your post? I don't know-- But most people just do what you did start a new one. Good Luck
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
raiseretrievers said:
What is the name of your state?WA

I was asked to apply for GAL. It appears to be an investigative position for the court. Is this something I qualify for?
WOW and DOUBLE WOW! I am continuing in overwhelmed mode, but have a good idea about what to do next.

I am filing the proof of service the afternoon and have already left a message for the detective who took the GM's statement to confirm that there was proof of identity so this incident doesn't look like something I had someone fabricate and it back fire at the hearing saying that I am trying to prove that the GM is not credible due to this event. Being such a good liar, the GM (if she was not positively identified) could disenvow any knowledge of the event and look at me and ask "how could you think that I'd do something like this" leaving me with no back-up. I have to look at this three dimensionally.

Let the evidence speak for it's self, what GM is doing will be apparent to the commissioner, you will have an opportunity to discredit GM's testimony.
What can I do to subpoena the tape as evidence? Is there a form? Will I have to subpoena the uncle as proof that he shot the video?
They will have some sort of form also important that it is whole, unedited and that you have an opportunnity to authenticate before entered as evidence.
Should my GF go to the hearing with me, or will a notarized declaration suffice?
Yes, she should do both as the commissioner will ask questions, remember all your children have been affected by this. Your GF will be a co-caretaker of the children and is a witness.
I am not taking the children to the hearing. They will be at school oblivious to the debacle.
Most likely they will have to say something or be interviewed possibly by the GAL.

Did I mention that I intend to make a written statement instead of trying to vocalize the facts verbally?
Make a written declaration but be prepared to answer quesitons. Have 4 copies of all written documents, one for you, opposing, the court, spare, file them after court since there will not be much time before and if the court had you fill out a complaint, that should be filed before if you can. Also be sure to get filed stamed copies after.

My first statement might be submitting the police report and to eliminate the GM as a party of the hearing by discrediting her. I believe, since both parents will be there, that she has no legal basis to even open her mouth. If she were to open her mouth, I want the commissioner to have a vote of no confidence in her. It should be between me, the mother and the court, right?
The commissioner wanted her testimony, you will have an opportunity to discredit, ask for a continuance if you need time to respond to anything they bring to court, this will not be your last court date.
Please, fill in the blanks and keep the comments and suggestions coming. Every little bit helps if only subliminally.

Thank you all very much for your support and assistance.
You may want to ask to court to order the phone records from all parties, this will show more than billing records, including calls that did not complete, it will show your attempts to communicate.
A GAL Guardian ad Litem represents your children in court, they will investigate and will interview the children and all parties, it will also help show that you are thinking of their best interest first and take the wind out of GM's sails.
 
Last edited:
In my parenting plan it says that I have a right "to apply to be the child's conservator, guardian ad litem or both". I am confused as to how I become a guardian ad litem if I am opne of the parents and what do I do with it if I get it.
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
raiseretrievers said:
In my parenting plan it says that I have a right "to apply to be the child's conservator, guardian ad litem or both". I am confused as to how I become a guardian ad litem if I am opne of the parents and what do I do with it if I get it.
You are in Washington state now, here is the link for information and application information
http://www.courts.wa.gov/committee/?fa=committee.home&committee_id=105
Duties and Responsibilities
The primary duty of a guardian ad litem (GAL) is to represent the best interests of the person for whom the GAL is appointed. Sometimes the person's wishes conflict with what is in the person's best interests. A GAL is an officer of the court and must maintain independence, conduct herself or himself professionally, avoid conflicts of interest, treat parties with respect, become informed about the case, timely inform the court of relevant information, limit duties to those ordered by the court, inform individuals about her or his role in the case, maintain the parties' privacy, perform duties in a timely manner, maintain documentation, and keep records of time and expenses. These requirements set forth ethical conduct standards, violation of which may subject the GAL to discipline. The duties and responsibilities of GALs are provided by court order, court rules, and statutes.

A sample order of appointment in a family law case
State Guardian ad Litem Court Rules
Governing statutes are found in RCW 2.56, RCW 11.88, RCW 13.34, RCW 26.12

Local court rules may be obtained from each superior court. Some local rules are available online.
 
Last edited:
I just got off the phone with Commissioners Services and they said I do not have to file proof of service under the circumstances and to explain to the commissioner the events leading up to the service and its necessity at the time. Also, the commissioner who heard my plea ex parte is not the one who is hearing the case tomorrow. The lady said that the commissioner pro tem is "a really nice guy".

I'm about to call the NCMEC.

Bye for now.
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
raiseretrievers said:
I just got off the phone with Commissioners Services and they said I do not have to file proof of service under the circumstances and to explain to the commissioner the events leading up to the service and its necessity at the time. Also, the commissioner who heard my plea ex parte is not the one who is hearing the case tomorrow. The lady said that the commissioner pro tem is "a really nice guy".

I'm about to call the NCMEC.

Bye for now.
I posted and edited above, with a different commissoner, things could be slightly different, based on their take. How did school go today?
 
My 10 year olad said "GREAT!" and my 8 year old said "Really good." There were no incidents at school.

I just got off the phone with the WA Clearinghouse of the NCMEC and rmet4nzkx and Illinois Parent made the right call about that one. The officer is FAXing excerpts from a book and is sending the entire book to me. I'm going to run down to the copy shop and pick it up.

Great tip. I'll also be investigating the other resources.
 
Back from getting the FAX. It contains good information about wording the parenting plan to restrict situations where the children might be at risk for abduction.

I'm in for an all-nighter here so I'll stay in touch. When I complete a task, if anyone would care to proof it for me, I'll post it.

Thank you for the support. I really feel it!
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
I'm glad school went well today and that you are finding the information helpful. You have a lot to do, make sure you prioritize, start with what you need for tomorrow first, then the other things, be sure to get a good night sleep and a good breakfast in the morning. Review in the morning after a good night's sleep. What time is your hearing? Best wishes to all.
 
first attempt at a statement

At this time I feel the best interests of the children are met if they are allowed to remain with me until the end of the 2004-2005 school year. At that time the best interests of Child1 and Child2 can be re-addressed and an order issued accordingly.
· Child1 and Child2 share one bedroom in a three-bedroom house that I have lived in with Girlfriend and her two children since May 2003.
· They are currently attending School1 Elementary School, which is about 100 yards away from our house and offers excellence in education.
· They maintain a healthy relationship with Girlfriend’s children who are also attending School1.
· Girlfriend and I have maintained our relationship for several years and do not anticipate any change.
· Girlfriend has been employed by Company1 in Town1 since September, 2002 with a good rate of pay and excellent benefits.
· I have worked for 1 ½ years at a nursing home as a cook and (without lapse of employ) currently work as Lead Cook for and established institution and receive excellent pay and benefits.
· We have substantial ties to family and the community and have maintained stability for quite some time.
· Either of us have the ability to support our entire family independently without the need for government assistance.

At this time I feel the best interests of the children will be in held in high disregard if custody is given to the mother.
· According to every account I have heard, she has moved out of her mother’s house and left the children in the custody of a non-parental third party (the grandmother) without regard to the rights of the father and in direct violation of the parenting plan.
o The parenting plan makes no provision for assignment of custody to anyone outside of the mother and father.
o No attempt was made “to provide addresses and contact telephone numbers to the other parent” or “to maintain free access and unhampered contact between the child and the other parent”.
o I tracked down the whereabouts of the children through School2, the children’s school, in October when I found that the home telephone number for the children had been disconnected. The school did not know anything about what was going on, but allowed me to speak with Child1 who told me they were living with his grandmother.
o I sent a calling card to the school for Child1 and Child2 so they could call me anytime.
o When I called the telephone number given to me by Child1, I was twice hung up on by the grandmother’s husband impairing my contact with the children.
o The grandmother told me that I should have Girlfriend or one of the kids call so I would not get hung up on again.
o Since October 24, 2004, I have had no contact from the mother although substantial change in circumstances have occurred in the children’s lives.
o After losing contact with the children once again, I contacted School2 School to find that they were no longer going there and were expected to have their transcripts sent to North Thurston School District.
o I contacted the school the following week and found that they were now enrolled in the School3 School. I contacted the principal and found out that the grandmother had enrolled them and was considered, by them, as the custodian.
o I asked the principal to contact the grandmother so I might have contact with her and Ex. I was given Ex’s cellular phone number and immediately left a message for her to call me. During the next two weeks I left numerous messages for her to contact me.
o After leaving five messages during Thanksgiving week, the grandmother called me the Saturday after Thanksgiving and asked if I wanted to have the kids the following weekend. We arranged a meeting place and time.
o The grandmother was at the Doty store at 3:45 on Friday, December 3, 2004, when I arrived. The children and I embraced and we were getting ready to go. The grandmother had the distinct smell of alcohol on her breath and was holding two 12 packs of Schmidts beer up to my girlfriends van window asking if she wanted to join her instead of going back home with me.
o Just before leaving, the grandmother informed me that she needed me to bring the children back and that she would not be there Sunday night when I was to bring them back. I was told to leave them with her brother at her house.
o Concerned about leaving my children there and perplexed why the children were living with a third party and not me, I again tried to reach Ex on her cellular phone at 3:30 pm Sunday, December 5. I received no response so I consulted the police who said that the grandmother had no rights to the children and as long as the mother did not show up I had every right to keep my children.
o The mother, as of Sunday, December 5, 2004, did not have a home to have the children live with her. Allegedly she has a job in xxxxx and is looking for a place to live.So begins this action.

. I filed the appropriate modification and restraining order paperwork on Monday, December 6, and had it signed by a Commissioner about 3:30 pm.
· After I made numerous attempts to reach Ex (always leaving messages on her voice mail) to no avail and after well over a month she could have contacted me, I heard nothing from her until the afternoon of Monday, December 6, when the grandmother came to my house, knocked on the door and said she was “here to pick up a couple of kids”, I told her she could not and that there was a court order granting me custody. She said “there is no court order” and forcibly removed Child2 from my house and was forcing him over to her van.
· The mother then came out from the van and shouted something to the affect that she knew I’d do this and said that there could be no order because she was not served. I gave her the modification and restraining order paperwork and said that she was served now. I then ran over to the grandmother and put my arms around my son and, removed him from his grandmother’s grip and returned him to my house. Uncle1, the grandmother’s brother, taped these events on behalf of the mother and grandmother.
. It is highly suspect that this was an abduction attempt due to its timeliness and the speed and force in which the grandmother took my youngest son from my home. He did not even have shoes or a jacket on and made comment to the grandmother that he had no shoes on when she grabbed him.
· The following day I received a call from Detective ##### of the XXXXX County Sheriffs office informing me that the grandmother accused me of intentionally stealing the clarinet she gave to Child1 as a gift. This supposedly took place Friday at the Doty store. The police report speaks for itself and the credibility of the grandmother.
· The mother has a history of disallowing my parenting time with the children and recent events prove that this is an ongoing situation.
· During the early part of our divorce, she fled with the children without notification to me. A note from her begins “Now, look what you made me do…” She denied the children from me from mid-December 2000 until late March 2001 when she was tracked down by my parents. I immediately filed for mediation.
· Again I was denied visitation from September 2001 through the end of December, 2001, because, she states in her response to contempt charges being brought up against her “Parenting time was not allowed for the petitioner with minor children, Child1 and Child2, due to violations of the Parenting Plan by the petitioner.” This implies that she feels she has a right to enforce the parenting plan without due process.




Well?
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is unreasonable to request supervised visits for the mother until she has proof of established residency in her job town of Olympia. Of, course, if she is working/living out of state (which I think there is a high probability), it will put her in a decision making mode.

I must add that to the proposed parenting plan and also court sanctions for non-compliance with the parenting plan and a provision for no out-of-state/country travel with children by mother.

I feel that what I am asking for is fair and reasonable. I am confident that I will do well tomorrow.
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
You left out of your chronology, when you went to get the emergency order even though it is mentioned before and after, specifically add that in at the appropriate place. Make point of listing her history of flight/parental abduction, interference with visitation, violation of orders, contempt, in addition to your efforts to locate you children, as this represents a high risk pattern. Did you file reports with the police on any of those occasions? Have records? Although you have the children in your custody now, you should contact the DA to pursue child abduction charges.

You may want to include that they knowingly, after you informed the GM that since mom had failed to respond that you were seeking to care for the children until she had a more stable situation, instead of mom communicating with you or responding to any of your calls as provided in the orders, lay in wait for the children in order to abduct them, while continuing to conceal the mother's presense in the van and after they were informed of the court's recent order.

You may want to limit the contact with persons who aided and abetted in the abductions or also violated the court orders, Specifically the GM who knowingly misrepresented her right to custody and also impaired visitation.

Don't forget to petition to have the child support changed so you are not still paying her or acruing arears inadvertandly.

Be prepared to be questioned about some of the events and to provide more information re the alcohol provisions.

You might want to request records from prior abductions and contempt records.

Have your records from Oregon available.

Good luck :)
 
Last edited:
opening statement

Commissioner, this matter, although originating from the state of Oregon, has juridiction in the state of Washington. The mother has resided in Washington since July, 2001, the children have resided in Washington continuously since July, 2001, and the father has resided in Washington since June, 2002. The father filed the decree and parenting plan with the XXXX County Clerks office in December 2001 in response to visitation denial and contempt charges made against the mother.

I respecftully request that a continuance be granted in this matter so that both parties may have ample time to prepare their case. I also request appointment of a guardian ad litem to represent the best interests of the children with associated costs equally shared by the mother and father. The mother should appreciate this time because it will allow her to establish residency in or near xxxxx where, I have been told, she has recently become employed after being unemployed for quite some time. The children are well provided for, safe and attending school about 100 yards from my house. At this time I have no objection to establishing some sort of parenting time with the mother at the Courts consideration and discretion.

However, the mother cannot at this time provide documentation of established ties to the community of xxxxx and recent events have put her in contempt of the existing parenting plan. Having a history of non-compliance with the parenting plan including abduction of the children at the beginning of our divorce and an attempted abduction of the children as recently as Monday, December 6, 2004, with the assistance of her mother and uncle, I believe that reasonable risk continues that the children may be abducted, secreted, or otherwise prevented from free and unhampered access to their father. I remind the Commissioner that there are three factors of risk of abduction: obstacles to location; recovery, and return if the child is abducted; and potential harm to the child if abducted. Harm is not inclusive of physical abuse but includes mental abuse as well. For example telling your children that if they visited their father they would be shot and killed by his girlfriends ex-husband, which was indeed used by the mother during visitation denial from September to December 2001, is an example of psychological harm imposed on the children by their mother. The considerations I am requesting a far less severe than the risks associated with abduction.

Given these statements and other evidence that I can provide given greater prepartion time, I believe an order of restraint should remain in effect for the mother and an order of restraint be issued to the grandmother and any and all agents of the mother and grandmother for protection of the children and thier rights as well as for my protection and for the protection of my rights as parent. This order should include provisions for supervised visitation, unauthorized pick-up of the children, a list of known addresses and telephone numbers of family members and descriptions and license plate numbers of their known vehicles to reduce the risks associated with this case and to aid in recovery should abduction occur. Also, given the mothers potential to flee the state, addresses and telephone numbers of all of her children’s fathers should be given as well as for her friend XXXX XXXXX who lives in state3. Also, if passports are in the mother’s possession for her or the children, these should be surrendered to the court. At a date and time appropriate for the review of this matter, ninety days should be considered minimum, the court may re-address all issues and establish a more permanent order for custody taking into evidence the findings of the guardian ad litem. Until that time, the mother should provide to the Court and the father current and accurate addresses and contact telephone numbers on a basis no less frequently than each 30 days to establish a pattern of stability and willingness to cooperate with any furture parenting plan.
 
Last edited:

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top