Using a 'Motion' to intimidate

[I AM ALWAYS LIABLE]

Re: Of course I'll respond...

[B


I've seen the two of you make these bullying efforts before. Are you two so unsure of your selves that you must resort to this?

=============================================

My response:

Thank you for acknowledging our "tag-team" efforts!

And, yes, speaking only for myself, my self-esteem is so low that I must resort to such low, underhanded, "sophomoric" and childish dialogue. Otherwise, this site would be boring.

Sometimes, Charlie, and in your case, it's just necessary.

IAAL

 

[stephenk]

boring boring boring Charlie. The sign of a person losing a debate - attack the other person and avoid the subject matter.

Your last few posts have been about how childish, immature, etc. I am and how I am bullying you. You even included IAAL, who only pointed out, correctly, that you didnt know what you were talking about. That really isnt bullying, but if you are like other "philosophers" I have met, as a group, you guys are kind of wimpy.

If you recall, YOU were the one who started with the insults about my profession and where I live. Since that didnt work you are now going to pout in the corner and put your fingers in your ears and yell "I'm not listening" over and over.

Now are you going to act like an adult philosopher Charlie and and respond to the legal authority and statutes that support my argument that being found "not guilty" does not mean you were found "innocent"?

 

[stephenk]

bump for Charlie.

 

[AmosMoses]

IAAL and sk,

You guys have the nerve to wonder why us laypeople are bothered by lawyers...it's all the technical legalese that we can't understand!!! I looked up "neener" AND "nyah" in my Black's Law Dictionary, and STILL couldn't find out their true definitions!! You must learn to stop using these complicated terms with us...it's simply over our heads!!

 

[stephenk]

i would have also used the famous nyuk nyuk nyuk, but i was serious at the moment.