In the general sense, I agree with the others. A few books, especially inexpensive ones, is not going to give a person anything but extremely superficial knowledge about the law. Heck, LAW SCHOOL is not going to give a person anything but an extremely superficial knowledge about the law. While I did not attend the finest school in the land (Think third-tier and then drop it a couple.), I read the same books as those in the finest in the land. At the end of the day, what one gets for much time, treasure and trouble is an outline. "Mind map" rather than "outline" is probably a better term. But, the key is spotting issues. You go down the outline in your head and for each "issue" you research it. That is the second benefit from LAW SCHOOL or just practicing law. Briefing cases.
I was lucky as the dean of my school gave, as a trick to succeed, the advice to brief every case. I did. Every one except for some dozens where life intervened. What that taught you was a skill. The skill of reading cases. suitandtie and I (and the others with knowledge) will read cases in totally different ways. Not only will suitandtie take FAR longer to get the nugget hidden in the prose, but also, he will not understand all the knowledge the authoring judge was trying to convey. You need to read a lot of cases in general and even more in specific to understand what a properly briefed judge is determining to be true and why. While the law is intended to describe and regularize human interaction, the law is hard. That's why it is a profession. (Not really. I think there are some specific issues like a code of ethics that make it so, but, *I* think the key is that you are constantly learning things. Just saying.)
At the same time, EVERYONE has a cheat sheet. I think I am an okay smart person. I have been involved with accounting and taxes for decades. Yet, I have a "cheat" book by my desk I look at constantly. (Read it fully every year too. Bathroom is a wonderful thing. [Not that anyone needed to know that.]) It's about 1-2 inches thick and is written by those knowledgeable in the field. For me, I call it my cheat book. I have great knowledge about taxation issues and this book gives me authoritative references to different issues I need to research when a client has a problem. I have to know the issues, but once I do this book tells me where to look for more. I cannot believe every attorney here does not have a similar cheat book. Mine costs about $80. How much does your's cost?
When you get to very specific things, I have deeper cheat books. Books that have the outline and provide answers and the cases that guide the answers. I suspect anyone who practices in an area has these as well. These books are expensive and are expensive every year. The law changes. A good law student knows where it might change and argue accordingly. However, I know I get new inserts every year for hundreds of dollars.
That gets me to the point of this thread. Why are we giving coatandtie so much grief? Certainly, he has not disclosed any facts from his suit. That is why all can reasonably answer without practicing law and part of why I have not answered him privately. There was a private offer of the specific case considered. Who wants that? Only the voyeurs. It seems he asks about knowledge in general and it seems, to me, he is getting grief. What up with that? (See how cool I am with phrasing.) I thought that's what we did here. If I am mistaken, please advise so I can temper what I provide.
Sure, coatandtie expresses much ignorance. Is there no way to change that? Or, can the law only be enforced by the priesthood?