• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

What is a realtor required to disclose regarding an undeveloped lot next to a home?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
The site and plan is exclusively set up by design to be exclusveily affordable housing (rentals) for seniors 62 and above. I don't believe they could come back and get around that plan.And yes, 45 is right in the middle, but that doesn't make it acceptable. We're still looking at 45 units, 90 seniors parking for up to 70 cars and more than 18 units per acre. This project will be jammed in.
You are assuming that every unit will be occupied by a couple and that each couple will have >1 car (and that none will have 0 cars).
 


RG and HV

Member
Yes, I am making those assumptions. It's routine when planning to anticipate what the "maximum/worst case" outcome/results would be and to plan accordingly.
 

xylene

Senior Member
The vacant lot is owned by the Medfield Housing Authority and they have planned on this project since the 1970s.
Umm, in this age it is incredibly easy to research land ownership.

One could easily expect vacant land LITERALLY owned by a public housing authority to one day be put to use as such..

Not to mention the plan is decades old and openly know to the public...
 

RG and HV

Member
Didn't seem stupid after WW2 when we made low cost housing available to our GIs and started building the suburbs and the middle class. You remember the middle class, right?
 

Taxing Matters

Overtaxed Member
And if they should have been notified but weren't, I'd say that's a big problem.
Your state doesn't require the seller notify the buyer of it. But if it did, that would not help the buyer or your neighborhood group in preventing the government from building the housing. All it would do is give a claim for the buyer to sue the seller for the failure to disclose for whatever damages the buyer suffered as a result. That's it. It has no impact on the government as it was not a party to the sale.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top