the_nite_owl
Junior Member
Hi,
I live in Massachusetts so my questions pertain to this state.
My wife is trying to get child support increased from her ex.
When the amount was set 3 years ago he reported very low income and was only paying $63. per week for two kids.
He works three jobs, two of them part time. During the divorce his lawyer claimed that the income on the two part time jobs only need be reported at 50% of his actual earnings. I do not know the reasoning or legality of this, it might have been based on other circumstances but my wife's lawyer (not my wife at that time of course) agreed that it was allowable.
Since that time his earnings have increased dramatically. He made over $56,000. between all of his jobs. Given his current income and my wife's income child support by the support calculator on the Department of Revenues web site should be in the neighborhood of $170. per week.
Initially he agreed to do the calculations and voluntarily amend the support amount but is balking at the numbers. Of course, this IS a big jump over what he was paying.
He believes that he is still allowed to claim only 50% of the income from his two part time jobs.
He thinks he is allowed to deduct his 401k contributions from the total gross.
He claims that overtime pay will be greatly reduced this year and estimated how much time he thinks he will work.
With the above assumptions he modified his own gross dollar amounts and ran them through the calculator and came up with a number around $100. per week.
I am certain that he cannot deduct his 401k from his gross earnings and that the calculations are based on previous earnings not what the "projects" that he will earn in the future, but what about claiming only 50% on his two part time jobs? Is this normally possible or the result of other circumstances?
I have been screwed over by my ex for years and am sensitive to the child support issue. I do not want to see this guy get hammered but he certainly needs to do more to help with supporting his kids. We may end up court in a battle over the amount because he and my wife just cannot find a way to communicate. I think we would probably get guidlines amounts but at the cost of attorneys fees and creating an even wider gap between them making future negotiations even more difficult.
What does he legally have to report for income? My assumption would be the total gross from all sources of income and that the courts would consider requests for reduction from guidelines based on circumstances.
I want to know if he actually does have the right to reduce his reported income and under what circumstances. If that IS the case then we can figure out what a more accurate figure should be and possibly come up with a mutual agreement instead of having to fight about it in court. I would even offer a reduction below guidelines just to keep things friendlier and on what I would consider a more reasonable level. I have personally been paying about $265. per week for a single child for about 5 years. I think MA guidelines are horrible. It is a matter of showing him that his legal obligation is $xxx. and then working out an agreement though and right now everyone has a different idea of what needs to be reported so we are not even coming close to agreement.
I would greatly appreciate any advice.
Also, my wife moved from the town she lived in with her ex to where I live about 45 minutes away. Is it possible to move the case from the former town to the new town for this and/or future modifications? The local courts said the modification has to be filed in the two the divorce agreement was filed in.
Thanks again.
Nite
I live in Massachusetts so my questions pertain to this state.
My wife is trying to get child support increased from her ex.
When the amount was set 3 years ago he reported very low income and was only paying $63. per week for two kids.
He works three jobs, two of them part time. During the divorce his lawyer claimed that the income on the two part time jobs only need be reported at 50% of his actual earnings. I do not know the reasoning or legality of this, it might have been based on other circumstances but my wife's lawyer (not my wife at that time of course) agreed that it was allowable.
Since that time his earnings have increased dramatically. He made over $56,000. between all of his jobs. Given his current income and my wife's income child support by the support calculator on the Department of Revenues web site should be in the neighborhood of $170. per week.
Initially he agreed to do the calculations and voluntarily amend the support amount but is balking at the numbers. Of course, this IS a big jump over what he was paying.
He believes that he is still allowed to claim only 50% of the income from his two part time jobs.
He thinks he is allowed to deduct his 401k contributions from the total gross.
He claims that overtime pay will be greatly reduced this year and estimated how much time he thinks he will work.
With the above assumptions he modified his own gross dollar amounts and ran them through the calculator and came up with a number around $100. per week.
I am certain that he cannot deduct his 401k from his gross earnings and that the calculations are based on previous earnings not what the "projects" that he will earn in the future, but what about claiming only 50% on his two part time jobs? Is this normally possible or the result of other circumstances?
I have been screwed over by my ex for years and am sensitive to the child support issue. I do not want to see this guy get hammered but he certainly needs to do more to help with supporting his kids. We may end up court in a battle over the amount because he and my wife just cannot find a way to communicate. I think we would probably get guidlines amounts but at the cost of attorneys fees and creating an even wider gap between them making future negotiations even more difficult.
What does he legally have to report for income? My assumption would be the total gross from all sources of income and that the courts would consider requests for reduction from guidelines based on circumstances.
I want to know if he actually does have the right to reduce his reported income and under what circumstances. If that IS the case then we can figure out what a more accurate figure should be and possibly come up with a mutual agreement instead of having to fight about it in court. I would even offer a reduction below guidelines just to keep things friendlier and on what I would consider a more reasonable level. I have personally been paying about $265. per week for a single child for about 5 years. I think MA guidelines are horrible. It is a matter of showing him that his legal obligation is $xxx. and then working out an agreement though and right now everyone has a different idea of what needs to be reported so we are not even coming close to agreement.
I would greatly appreciate any advice.
Also, my wife moved from the town she lived in with her ex to where I live about 45 minutes away. Is it possible to move the case from the former town to the new town for this and/or future modifications? The local courts said the modification has to be filed in the two the divorce agreement was filed in.
Thanks again.
Nite