• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Would common law marriage stop child support?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

What is the name of your state? CO

My sister is 17 years old and has a child of her own, and lives with our mom. Our dad pays our mom cs for my sister. She is thinking about filing her taxes jointly with her baby's father, which would make them common law married. Would this mean my dad would not have to pay child support any longer?
 


tigger22472

Senior Member
MomTryin2Improv said:
What is the name of your state? CO

My sister is 17 years old and has a child of her own, and lives with our mom. Our dad pays our mom cs for my sister. She is thinking about filing her taxes jointly with her baby's father, which would make them common law married. Would this mean my dad would not have to pay child support any longer?
Does the baby's father also live with your mom?
 

Litigation!

Senior Member
MomTryin2Improv said:
What is the name of your state? CO

My sister is 17 years old and has a child of her own, and lives with our mom. Our dad pays our mom cs for my sister. She is thinking about filing her taxes jointly with her baby's father, which would make them common law married. Would this mean my dad would not have to pay child support any longer?

My response:

A 17 year old WITH a baby of her own sure doesn't need child support from her own father.

Sounds to me like your sister is a skank.


IAAL
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
Then they cannot or would not be considered common law married, nor could they file taxes together... making the issue of CS from your father moot.
 
Litigation! said:
My response:

A 17 year old WITH a baby of her own sure doesn't need child support from her own father.

Sounds to me like your sister is a skank.


IAAL
I would agree that she shouldn't be receiving the child support.

Your other comment is just judgemental, harsh, and definitely not an answer to the question I asked.
 

Litigation!

Senior Member
MomTryin2Improv said:
Your other comment is just judgemental, harsh, and definitely not an answer to the question I asked.

My response:

You're right, but it is accurate. A child having a child is skanky. I guess your Mom never taught her about birth control - - or, hell, about abstinence.

Another Welfare Mom to soak us taxpayers. Tell her "thanks."

IAAL
 
M

MominMass

Guest
She'd probably be considered emancipated by the courts and her father could ask for his order to be vacated.

Don't worry about IAAL, he just happens to like the word "skank" lately.
It has replaced his exhaustive use of "dufus". While I agree with many of his opinions, he is a bit of a butthead.
 

Litigation!

Senior Member
MominMass said:
She'd probably be considered emancipated by the courts and her father could ask for his order to be vacated.

Don't worry about IAAL, he just happens to like the word "skank" lately.
It has replaced his exhaustive use of "dufus". While I agree with many of his opinions, he is a bit of a butthead.

My response:

Thanks; however, a small correction. I've been a contributor to these forums since January 2000 - - that's six years for those who can't count. Anyway, I've been using "skank," "dufus," "trailer trash," and other assorted monikers and adjectives for nearly all those years. So, it's nothing new.

So, nothing has been "replaced" - - merely, the type of post required just the right adjective.

I wonder how old our writer's mother is? Usually, skankiness runs in the family, from generation to generation.


IAAL
 
M

MominMass

Guest
Litigation! said:
My response:

Thanks; however, a small correction. I've been a contributor to these forums since January 2000 - - that's six years for those who can't count. Anyway, I've been using "skank," "dufus," "trailer trash," and other assorted monikers and adjectives for nearly all those years. So, it's nothing new.

So, nothing has been "replaced" - - merely, the type of post required just the right adjective.

I wonder how old our writer's mother is? Usually, skankiness runs in the family, from generation to generation.


IAAL
I don't care if you've been opining on these forums for a hundred years, Butthead. I simply noted that you have used the skank word more than the dufus word in recent posts. Check out original use of skank as a verb. Now back off, I'm skanking!


Skank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Look up skank in Wiktionary, the free dictionarySkank or skanky is a slang term, and is an adjective or noun referring to one who is undesirable as a result of unacceptable behavior. Most often this behavior relates to drug use, sexual practices, and/or personal hygiene and style. Originally associated with a bad smell and/or scummy or dirty surface, it has come to refer to someone who is either or both physically repugnant for their filth and morally or socially repugnant for their behavior and demeanor, most often sexually. Prostitutes are often associated with the term though in reference to a usually non-whoring person. It is pejorative. "Skanking" originally referred to menstruation, but today it is usually used to refer to a dance where the dancer jumps in a rhythm similar to skipping and swings one hand out to their side and then back in and across their body while kicking the opposite leg out- then doing the same with the other arm and leg and repeating.

Recent usage of the term in the United States has been to describe a particular kind of female behavior, characterized by wanton selfishness, repeated self-detrimental behavior, flirting and sexual promiscuity.
 

Happy Trails

Senior Member
MominMass said:
She'd probably be considered emancipated by the courts and her father could ask for his order to be vacated.

Don't worry about IAAL, he just happens to like the word "skank" lately.
It has replaced his exhaustive use of "dufus". While I agree with many of his opinions, he is a bit of a butthead.
Why would she possibly be considered emancipated?
 
B

betterthanher

Guest
MominMass said:
She'd probably be considered emancipated by the courts and her father could ask for his order to be vacated.
"Probably"?

Care to cite case law and/or state statutes that says a child getting pregnant would be grounds for emancipation?

I'd say you DEFINITELY gave incorrect advice.
 
M

MominMass

Guest
Happy Trails said:
Why would she possibly be considered emancipated?
Because she would be married. Doesn't the post say they want to file taxes together and would be common law married?
 

Happy Trails

Senior Member
MominMass said:
Because she would be married. Doesn't the post say they want to file taxes together and would be common law married?

It has already been established that they do not have a common law marriage. Neither of the two live with each other; they still live with their parents.
 
M

MominMass

Guest
betterthanher said:
"Probably"?

Care to cite case law and/or state statutes that says a child getting pregnant would be grounds for emancipation?

I'd say you DEFINITELY gave incorrect advice.

I'm confused. These kids are already preparing to file taxes jointly so that they can get the tax credit for their child. Poster says this makes them common law married? Is that not true? Are you saying that a father still has to pay support for a child who is married?
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top