Fraud: Statements made to Consul, US Embassy, Manila, Philippines, December 1997
Evidence: Received November 2011, none earlier.
Desired immediate outcome: Embassy letter asserting that, were evidence known to them at the time, immigration would have been denied on grounds of fraudulent marriage.
Desired eventual outcome: Denial by judge in Virginia divorce of benefits accruing from marriage, viz. military retirement.
NB: Virginia has no common law marriage. I hope the judge will act in this determination as if parties were not married.
Question 1: Feasibility of obtaining statement? All advice on tips, tricks, traps, and strategies welcome.
Question 2: Feasibility of obtaining judge's favorable decision? Again, hope for advice on tips, tricks, traps, and methods.
Evidence: Received November 2011, none earlier.
Desired immediate outcome: Embassy letter asserting that, were evidence known to them at the time, immigration would have been denied on grounds of fraudulent marriage.
Desired eventual outcome: Denial by judge in Virginia divorce of benefits accruing from marriage, viz. military retirement.
NB: Virginia has no common law marriage. I hope the judge will act in this determination as if parties were not married.
Question 1: Feasibility of obtaining statement? All advice on tips, tricks, traps, and strategies welcome.
Question 2: Feasibility of obtaining judge's favorable decision? Again, hope for advice on tips, tricks, traps, and methods.