single317dad
Senior Member
Not that people don't forgive back support in exchange for allowing a stepparent adoption; I've seen it done. You just better not walk into court and state it that way.
Some states do not allow the selling of children like that by statute.Not that people don't forgive back support in exchange for allowing a stepparent adoption; I've seen it done. You just better not walk into court and state it that way.
You can take all the offense you want but if you have thoughts of forgiving his arrearages for his agreeing to relinguish that is selling your child and it is offensive for you to state such a thing AND it is equivocable to selling or buying your child.I take huge offense to that and don't think it was called for. I thought relinquishing ones parental rights negates their obligation to child support.
Maybe you should avoid ressurecting old threads?????I would hope that she couldn't get the rights. As long as you can prove general concern that she might expose your boys to your ex then I don't think she can get the rights. Obviously with aiding your ex she is showing that she doesn't have the boys best interest in mind. I hope that you and your children can find a safe solution to this problem. What a grandma....
You clearly are not familiar with third party visitation law/cases.This business of the protection orders has nothing whatsoever to do with the paternal grandmother’s rights of access to your twin boys.
Her rights of visitation are governed by Section 38-129 of the Kansas Statutes as upheld as constitutional in Skov v. Wicker. 272 Kan. 240 (2001).
You of course would have the right to contest such an application. But the fact that you have allowed visits in the past and no intervening material change of circumstances of her doing would not serve you well.
What EXACTLY did the Judge say? Was the case dismissed with or without Prejudice?I forgot to update after we went to court.
Not only did my ex-mother-in-law lose the court case, the judge ordered her to pay all my attorney fees. He called her "arrogant" many times.
I have a feeling she is going to take me to court and try this all over again. She has the money to do so....
What EXACTLY did the Judge say? Was the case dismissed with or without Prejudice?