Well I feel badly for the OP but it seems to me that she has received good advice that could have set the stage to her favor. Now, she’s off on a rant tangent and probably does not even know if the camera is active, recording or if it ever has … who knows. What we do know is that there is nothing illegal about the current activity.
Frankly, if the judge is worth his salt, and he likely is, he will tell you to address the issue at hand ... the trespass ticket, which you are admittedly guilty. The neighbor is not in violation of the law so what do you expect to accomplish ... a rant in Court? The Court can not help you and it can not tell the guy to not use the camera …. Not this way anyway.
CHOICE OF EVILS - In criminal law, the defense that a person was justified in committing an offense because doing so avoided a greater harm. See Manual § 5.9 and C.R.S. § 18-1-702.
Now this is really brilliant …. Why not just kill the guy then since you’re clearly in your right ... lol.
You have apparently rationalized this down to settling for the result you want (to rant in Court) but for the wrong reasons and the result you obtain hopefully will not be a result that will address the underlying issue. If it were then the Judge needs his ticket pulled. I think guy can essentially tell the judge to piss off (in a nice way) if he wanders into this camera business and what he is doing. You nor the Court are mind readers and you can not say what the neighbors intent is.
If I were the neighbor and you tried to pull something like that or your ridiculous sign idea, you would get covered up with legal jumbo. It is just the wrong approach and you are not thinking with the correct part of your anatomy.
I would be VERY careful what you say in the Court about this guy because you will be on a very narrow ledge. Sort of like the sign idea … hang on honey when you do that.