well I just spoke with a family attorney here in NC.
and he advised me that I do have a leg to stand on
if fraud was involved before the adoption.
My Birth Mother did not tell biological father she was
pregnant AND she knew who the father was. Therefore
she defrauded the adoption agency by lying to them
that she didn't know. According to the law, an adoption
cannot occur legally unless BOTH mother and father
agree to it. Since he was the father and was never notified
then fraud occurred and the adoption was not legal cuz
he didn't have a say-so. If the adoption was not legal,
therefore ************** I have a claim.
Ahem...not to rain on your victory parade, but.....
IF you had any claim on the basis of fraud, the person who would be held liable for such fraud would be the woman who gave birth to you....NOT the man who was defrauded.
HE OWES YOU NOTHING. Further, the SOL for establishing paternity has run out in NC.
GS_49-14
§ 49‑14. Civil action to establish paternity.
(a) The paternity of a child born out of wedlock may be established by civil action at any time prior to such child's eighteenth birthday. A copy of a certificate of birth of the child shall be attached to the complaint. The establishment of paternity shall not have the effect of legitimation. The social security numbers, if known, of the minor child's parents shall be placed in the record of the proceeding.
(b) Proof of paternity pursuant to this section shall be by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.
(c) No such action shall be commenced nor judgment entered after the death of the putative father, unless the action is commenced either:
(1) Prior to the death of the putative father;
(2) Within one year after the date of death of the putative father, if a proceeding for administration of the estate of the putative father has not been commenced within one year of his death; or
(3) Within the period specified in G.S. 28A‑19‑3(a) for presentation of claims against an estate, if a proceeding for administration of the estate of the putative father has been commenced within one year of his death.
Any judgment under this subsection establishing a decedent to be the father of a child shall be entered nunc pro tunc to the day preceding the date of death of the father.
(d) If the action to establish paternity is brought more than three years after birth of a child or is brought after the death of the putative father, paternity shall not be established in a contested case without evidence from a blood or genetic marker test.
(e) Either party to an action to establish paternity may request that the case be tried at the first session of the court after the case is docketed, but the presiding judge, in his discretion, may first try any pending case in which the rights of the parties or the public demand it.
(f) When a determination of paternity is pending in a IV‑D case, the court shall enter a temporary order for child support upon motion and showing of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of paternity. For purposes of this subsection, the results of blood or genetic tests shall constitute clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of paternity if the tests show that the probability of the alleged parent's parentage is ninety‑seven percent (97%) or higher. If paternity is not thereafter established, then the putative father shall be reimbursed the full amount of temporary support paid under the order.
(g) Invoices for services rendered for pregnancy, childbirth, and blood or genetic testing are admissible as evidence without requiring third party foundation testimony and shall constitute prima facie evidence of the amounts incurred for the services or for testing on behalf of the child. (1967, c. 993, s. 1; 1973, c. 1062, s. 3; 1977, c. 83, s. 2; 1981, c. 599, s. 14; 1985, c. 208, ss. 1, 2; 1993, c. 333, s. 3; 1995, c. 424, ss. 1, 2; 1997‑154, s. 1; 1997‑433, ss. 4.2, 4.10; 1998‑17, s. 1; 2005‑389, s. 3.)
Buddy, if you want to line the atty's pockets, go ahead. Just know....that's ALL you will be doing.