Frankly, it seems much more likely that mom is hoping that dad will not push the issue at all since it seems she has a habit of playing musical daddies. IMO I do not see what is so odd about a new father wanting to spend the night with his newborn, especially when he knows it will be a quite a while for the chance to do so again. If mom was a bit uncomfortable, perhaps it was because she chose to put herself in the situation of having a new SO before her child was born, and it's just easier to play family with the new BF than admit she is a tad, um, promiscuous. But of course since OP doesn't have a uterus there must be something terribly weird or unnatural with a new parent wanting to share a few extra hours with their newborn, especially since he will eventually get all of about 6 hours a week with the baby. How much more could a father possibly want?My guess in this scenario is that mom is a little uncomfortable about dad (come on guys we all know that his initial request to spend the night at the hospital without her support system being around was over the top) and therefore mom chose to give the child her last name and chose not to press the issue of the AOP.
OP, once you are legally established as dad, you can motion for a name change, along with custody and visitation. Unless mom is willing to completely change the child's last name, then it's most likely that the court will decide to hyphenate the last name.
Mom will not be able to rename the child based on her flavor of the week.
ETA: Noted and quoted.
Last edited: