So, can I ask, is grandpa is driving to the sheriff's office with the child? And is he really drunk? Just thinking how ballsy that is to be drunk, driving a kid to the sheriff's office and exchanging there and going. If he is indeed drunk. (not implying he hasn't been drinking, but rather the legal definition of drunk). I actually kind of understand why you told grandpa about not giving her back unless her mom contacts you there - you felt if he went after you, what a better place to be protected and have witnesses. BUT, as you can see, it isn't just about your protection, but her's as well. She probably sees so much more than she even verbalizes to you, but seeing you two fight doesn't help her. Honestly, this sounds like a situation that's going to get worse before it gets any better. I'm not a lawyer, but doesn't grandpa pushing dad give some merit to looking at some protective order? Not certain how that would help your kiddo though.
As for his suing you, tell him to go ahead and try it. Then ask for lawyer fees and I'd even go so far as reimbursement for work missed in defending a frivolous suit.
And like I said, I'm not a lawyer, and I'm hoping a senior can answer this, but why couldn't dad sue the grandparents for third party interference with visitation?? Why would his attorney worried about a visitation interference against dad from the grandparents if they don't have custody or guardianship? And am I missing something, or why does he have to give kiddo to the grandparents at all? If mom isn't there, then he doesn't have to exchange kiddo, right? (Like I said, I could be missing something).
Sorry, I tend to think out loud... it annoys all the other voices in my head too much to keep it all in there. lol
As for his suing you, tell him to go ahead and try it. Then ask for lawyer fees and I'd even go so far as reimbursement for work missed in defending a frivolous suit.
And like I said, I'm not a lawyer, and I'm hoping a senior can answer this, but why couldn't dad sue the grandparents for third party interference with visitation?? Why would his attorney worried about a visitation interference against dad from the grandparents if they don't have custody or guardianship? And am I missing something, or why does he have to give kiddo to the grandparents at all? If mom isn't there, then he doesn't have to exchange kiddo, right? (Like I said, I could be missing something).
Sorry, I tend to think out loud... it annoys all the other voices in my head too much to keep it all in there. lol