That's an unreasonable expectation
.
What ? That a consumer expects a new product to actually work correctly ?
Yes they do.
And cheap new hardware from companies like Dell gets tested on the user, not at the factory.
Give me an intelligent break .
Dell warranties suck, deliberately, because it would cripple Dell to give onsite support when they are testing these things on the end users.
See above .
And when a Dell customer buys "onsite support" ala carte, it still doesn't mean Dell will send a technician. It means Dell will send you the replacement parts, and someone will walk you through the repair over the phone (ie. the labor part of the warranty is the phone operator). It's a joke.
Don't know ,never bought a Dell.But yeah many consumers wouldn't dare open a case up.
Now in this case, the merchant is willing to do the labor. So the buyer is actually given a benefit that other buyers of cheap Dell equipment don't get. The customer refuses to bring the machine in for repair.
And we still do not know why ? Has the seller been given many opportunities to repair ?
Another thought, bradlm - have you offered onsite support yourself? That is, offer to show up at the customers business or residence and fix the machine? Considering your customer just wants a refund, they may turn down that offer as well, which would work in your favor in court.
The consumer seems fixed on a refund .A refund was offered.
Yes some Cos. and agencies " Employee " will state one thing ,only to have management say that person had no authority to to say anything of the sort ,it won't happen .