I'm not sure that's true. If this is the legal father of the child, regardless of his custody status and barring a restraining order barring him from contact with the child, it's highly unlikely that the school would prevent him from taking the child with him.
Transferring records, yes. But physically taking kiddo for the day? Not likely. It's not their job to enforce court orders - we certainly tell posters that often enough.
Yes, good point. Maybe they didn't do anything wrong.
However, it concerns me that Dad shows up at the door with a legal document and "she didn't know what the paper was that the Father had given her", yet she let the child go with him. Maybe I'm jaded, but if someone showed up at my door with legal documents, I think I'd be cautious. First thing I'd do is read the document to see what it says. Then, I'd check the school records to see if Dad was authorized to pick up the child (a list of people authorized to pick up the child is pretty much required these days). If Dad wasn't on the list, I'd have called the guardians and/or not let the child go.
I don't know if Dad was on the list, so I can't say if the school has legal culpability. But it does look like sloppiness on their part to get a legal document and not know what it says.
Contempt of what, exactly? OP seems to think Dad shouldn't even be named in the court orders - which means they don't apply to him.
Contempt of the custody orders. Dad apparently kept the child for 3 days that was not in his visitation time. Even without a restraining order, that should be enough to earn him a strong reprimand (at the very least) from the judge. Given that he enrolled the child in a different school, it might be enough for stronger action.
Also, this apparently happened in August. SEVEN MONTHS ago. One wonders why Grandma/Grandpa is JUST NOW wondering who's responsible for the child missing 3 days of school and coming to no harm.
Agreed.