Am i in Contempt????

[Just Blue]

It is also possible that the judge would order that Dad can have anyone he wishes at the visitation - even a GF if he wishes. It's Dad's visitation time and Mom has no right to interfere.

Judge may order that only child, dad, dads family, and supervisor are at visitation.

****************************...

 

[Zigner]

Blue - that doesn't mean the judge couldn't be less restrictive.

 

[Just Blue]

The judge already signed the order, my ex needs 3 supervised visits before standard visiattion gets taken into affect. However, because of my mom's statement we are requesting this visitation be supervised for longer, can the judge make another hearing?

Sure the judge can...Will he? Probably not. Judges are not stupid and you are making it very clear what your objective is.

 

[Zigner]

Not to mention that, by the time they got in for another hearing, all 3 supervised visits would have occurred and non-supervised visits would have started, making it a moot issue.

 

[Just Blue]

Blue - that doesn't mean the judge couldn't be less restrictive.

True. Judge may stop the supervised visits and order that regular visits proceed.

 

[mistoffolees]

****************************...

Please read my post carefully. You said that the judge could allow just Dad, Dad's family, the supervisor, and the child at visitation.

I said that the judge could allow Dad to have ANYONE he wished at the visitation - such as a GF. Since the GF is not a member of Dad's family, I was not simply repeating your post.

 

[stealth2]

i dont trust my sister because of things she has done and said in the past. Also because my sister's husband doesn't have a clean background, I don't think the judge will approve of their house as well. That's why it should be my mom, our child knows her and she has a clean record.

Yet, a few days ago, you didn't dispute that you both trust your sister. Do you see how this damages your credibility and brings your true motives to light? The judge will.

he suggests my sister since we can both trust her and get along with her but i dont want my sister i want my mom because she will tell the judge that my son doesnt want to go with his dad. my ex agreed to do it this sunday with my mom but the rest of time be with my sister i won't agree to that.

I would expect also, that the the judge may well assign a different supervisor because your Mom is not facilitating the visits, either.

 

[nextwife]

Mom should not have even BEEN at the visit. It's DAD's time.

Amen to that! How distracting!

Mom needed to REMOVE herself from the room completely. Maybe she couldn't because of the embilical cord still connected to kiddo?

 

[stealth2]

stealth is in spelling mode today... umbilical.

 

[mariasusa]

Lets say you file a motion for what...modification of supervised visits (grasping at straws here)...however, as pointed out, unsupervised visits will be happening by then.

AND, playing this out in front of a judge...Oh your Honor, there was friction at the supervised setting. Son should NOT have unsupervised visits anytime soon.

Dad - well, yes there was friction...mom not only came but insisted on bringing her boyfriend. There was too much going on. It was distracting to our son and I couldn't get to spend time with him

Judge...to YOU...Mom? You were AT the supervised visit? With your boyfriend? Not only are you disrupting dads visitation time with the son, but I am holding you in contempt the next time I hear of you interfering with dad building a relationship.

 

[Zigner]

stealth is in spelling mode today... umbilical.

...spelling & 3rd person mode!

 

[lilmansmom]

Lets say you file a motion for what...modification of supervised visits (grasping at straws here)...however, as pointed out, unsupervised visits will be happening by then.

AND, playing this out in front of a judge...Oh your Honor, there was friction at the supervised setting. Son should NOT have unsupervised visits anytime soon.

Dad - well, yes there was friction...mom not only came but insisted on bringing her boyfriend. There was too much going on. It was distracting to our son and I couldn't get to spend time with him

Judge...to YOU...Mom? You were AT the supervised visit? With your boyfriend? Not only are you disrupting dads visitation time with the son, but I am holding you in contempt the next time I hear of you interfering with dad building a relationship.

The judge NEVER stated that I could not be there. And for him "wanting" this relationship he could have met with our child WITHOUT his spouse there. That is why we stayed, if she could be there we could be there as well. Our child did ask that we not leave him, i only obeyed our childs wishes. We were at Mcdonalds for 5 hours, he never bought him food (which we noted and will make sure the judge knows), people were coming in and out, his spouse family showed up and our child does not know them and kept away (also noted)... it's these types of hings as to why he should still have supervised visits.

 

[Zigner]

The judge NEVER stated that I could not be there.

It's HIS visit time. It's improper for you to have been there.

And for him "wanting" this relationship he could have met with our child WITHOUT his spouse there. That is why we stayed, if she could be there we could be there as well.

Wrong, it's none of your business who HE has at HIS visitations.

Our child did ask that we not leave him, i only obeyed our childs wishes.

Oh good grief!

We were at Mcdonalds for 5 hours, he never bought him food (which we noted and will make sure the judge knows), people were coming in and out, his spouse family showed up and our child does not know them and kept away (also noted)... it's these types of hings as to why he should still have supervised visits.

So?

 

[lilmansmom]

It's HIS visit time. It's improper for you to have been there.

Wrong, it's none of your business who HE has at HIS visitations. Oh good grief!
So?

So, it was a little unfair that WE had to buy him his own breakfast AND lunch, and as soon as his other child got there, he buys his other child food and not our child?!? (noted)... The judge never said I couldn't be there.. never!

 

[Zigner]

So, it was a little unfair that WE had to buy him his own breakfast AND lunch, and as soon as his other child got there, he buys his other child food and not our child?!? (noted)...

If you weren't there, he would have bought the food.

The judge never said I couldn't be there.. never!

Doesn't need to. It's improper for you to be there on HIS time.