You seriously want to argue that telling a new employee "you may, at some nebulous point in the future, be involuntarily terminated, in which case your pay rate will be retroactively decreased" constitutes sufficient notification? The spirit of laws prohibiting retroactive pay decreases is that it is fundamentally unjust to tell somebody you will pay them $15 an hour and then after they have worked thinking they would earn $15 an hour, tell them they will only be getting $10 an hour for time already worked.
Last edited: