• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Added spouse to deed while married but purchased home before marriage.

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

junkmailbox119

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California. I purchased my current home before I was married. After marrying my wife I added her to the deed. It has come to the point where we will be getting a divorce and would like to know how the property will be divided. Will she get half of the value of the property once the home is sold, is she entitled to half of the equity left after the sale of the home, or is she just entitled to the equity between the time she was added to the deed and the time of the divorce? Thanks.
 


Ohiogal

Queen Bee
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California. I purchased my current home before I was married. After marrying my wife I added her to the deed. It has come to the point where we will be getting a divorce and would like to know how the property will be divided. Will she get half of the value of the property once the home is sold, is she entitled to half of the equity left after the sale of the home, or is she just entitled to the equity between the time she was added to the deed and the time of the divorce? Thanks.
She is entitled to half the equity in the home.
 

latigo

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California. I purchased my current home before I was married. After marrying my wife I added her to the deed. It has come to the point where we will be getting a divorce and would like to know how the property will be divided. Will she get half of the value of the property once the home is sold, is she entitled to half of the equity left after the sale of the home, or is she just entitled to the equity between the time she was added to the deed and the time of the divorce? Thanks.
(You probably won't take the time to read this, but I'm going to post it anyhow.)

Let me begin by saying that in all the many years of private practice I never once allowed a client to transfer an interest in their separately owned land to a spouse! They may have done it elsewhere, but never through my office. And when you begin to face the legal problems in dealing with the disposition of the property through a divorce you will understand why.

(Obviously the same difficulties in distribution arise in a divorce when the property is initially purchased jointly. But you have unnecessarily created them.)

Next, in the context and time frame you are using it the expression, "she was added to the deed" is inaccurate. If anything, her name was placed of record as a part owner of the property.

And for that to have happened you needed to have deeded her a percentage of your ownership by a separate deed.(Not adding her name to yours.) Plus it would have to be recorded in the county land records.

So, whatever interest she has in the home will be reflected by the words of conveyance as set out in that deed. That is, the percentage or fraction that you gave to her. But in no instance is that percentage of ownership and her entitlement to the proceeds of a sale affected by the date the ownership interest was transferred to her.

Now then, if want to know the problems you will be encountering with the home should you two separate and proceed with a divorce and some solutions, just ask.
 

junkmailbox119

Junior Member
realfilm, yes I unfortunately learned the hard way.

Latigo, I wouldn't mind learning more on what I have in store so I can prepare mentally. I added her through a quit claim as husband and wife as community property with right of survivorship.
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
realfilm, yes I unfortunately learned the hard way.

Latigo, I wouldn't mind learning more on what I have in store so I can prepare mentally. I added her through a quit claim as husband and wife as community property with right of survivorship.
If you are joint tenants, my answer stands. She is entitled to half the equity in the house. Meaning, half of all money left if you sell the house AFTER paying the outstanding mortgages/home equity loans/closing costs and realtor fees.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
contrary to other's statements, I see nothing wrong with what you did. Part of a marriage is showing commitment to the other party and that is what you did in adding her to title of the property. While in a business sense it is the wrong thing to do, in the sense of sharing with one's spouse, I see nothing wrong with it at all. Sorry the marriage didn't work out but at least you can argue you proved commitment (at least regarding this) to the relationship.

Sometimes in life we have to stick out necks out, even if it means risking losing your head. It's the human thing to do.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
contrary to other's statements, I see nothing wrong with what you did. Part of a marriage is showing commitment to the other party and that is what you did in adding her to title of the property. While in a business sense it is the wrong thing to do, in the sense of sharing with one's spouse, I see nothing wrong with it at all. Sorry the marriage didn't work out but at least you can argue you proved commitment (at least regarding this) to the relationship.

Sometimes in life we have to stick out necks out, even if it means risking losing your head. It's the human thing to do.
Still though, I would not have done it.
 

Bali Hai

Senior Member
contrary to other's statements, I see nothing wrong with what you did. Part of a marriage is showing commitment to the other party and that is what you did in adding her to title of the property. While in a business sense it is the wrong thing to do, in the sense of sharing with one's spouse, I see nothing wrong with it at all. Sorry the marriage didn't work out but at least you can argue you proved commitment (at least regarding this) to the relationship.

Sometimes in life we have to stick out necks out, even if it means risking losing your head. It's the human thing to do.
I wholeheartedly agree.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
You didn't explain why.
For a couple of different reasons actually. My home is my home. I wouldn't want to have to sell it or re-mortgage it if something went wrong. I want my daughter to have it when I am gone.
 

Bali Hai

Senior Member
For a couple of different reasons actually. My home is my home. I wouldn't want to have to sell it or re-mortgage it if something went wrong. I want my daughter to have it when I am gone.
Does that mean if you were to marry someone, you would "kind of" marry them and wouldn't put your complete trust in that person and become a complete marital unit? The OP took that risk and lost, but you're not even getting to the starting gate.

Don't get me wrong, I agree and that's exactly why people in these current times should not marry. Too many gold diggers out there and people these days just can't be trusted.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
Does that mean if you were to marry someone, you would "kind of" marry them and wouldn't put your complete trust in that person and become a complete marital unit? The OP took that risk and lost, but you're not even getting to the starting gate.

Don't get me wrong, I agree and that's exactly why people in these current times should not marry. Too many gold diggers out there and people these days just can't be trusted.
Not at this stage of life. We wouldn't be starting off in life amassing our assets as a married couple. We would each likely have adult children to whom we wanted to leave assets. If you mingle everything, and are not very careful about it, then the children of whomever is the last to pass away would end up with all of the assets and the other children would be left in the cold.

So yes, I would keep my separate assets, separate.
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
Not at this stage of life. We wouldn't be starting off in life amassing our assets as a married couple. We would each likely have adult children to whom we wanted to leave assets. If you mingle everything, and are not very careful about it, then the children of whomever is the last to pass away would end up with all of the assets and the other children would be left in the cold.

So yes, I would keep my separate assets, separate.
And a spouse can take against a will the intestate share if so desired. So the children would not necessarily get more than that.
 

Bali Hai

Senior Member
Not at this stage of life. We wouldn't be starting off in life amassing our assets as a married couple. We would each likely have adult children to whom we wanted to leave assets. If you mingle everything, and are not very careful about it, then the children of whomever is the last to pass away would end up with all of the assets and the other children would be left in the cold.

So yes, I would keep my separate assets, separate.
I see, you're saying let the young ignorant people fall into the trap that you are skillfully avoiding.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top