i want my girl protected from both possible physical harm and white supremest teachings. i know he pled guilty to breaking the restraining order once and that the reason hes moving in is he was in court about something involving him and his roommate,she wouldnt tell me what but i do know he went to court about it but know that hes lost his place to live(read- using her). the baby is 3 months old and hes only around now that he doesnt have a place to be. her mother told me i cant talk to her about it. my daughter even told me he does a radio show in the apt they live in where he spreads his hatred of non whites.
You might want to read this thread:
https://forum.freeadvice.com/child-custody-visitation-37/racism-grounds-change-custody-317090.html
And if you're really up for it, this is an interesting article (I'd love to read OG's perspective on this - without question there's really nobody else here who can even begin to touch on her experience and what she lives every day she works).
http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/family.pdf
At its simplest, you would be asking the court to trample on someone's Constitutional rights. As distasteful as it is to you, I just cannot see the court ruling in your favor even if you tried to use "best interest".
See where we're coming from?
Edited to add: There have been cases of custody being switched, but these cases involve either direct harm to the child, or are part of a much bigger overall parenting failure.
Edited further because I'm a ditz : I personally feel that we'd be looking at a horribly slippery slope if we start to restrict the most basic of rights. What next? The court can control what we tell our children? Will we be stopped from teaching basic biology because it includes discussions of - oh no! - sex?