Messing with my mail

[Zigner]

OhioGal is the Attorney on this thread and who's advice you should follow ...Good Luck to You!!

If spellcheck didn't catch that error, someone with a Masters degree should have!

What error?

Here is a restatement of Blue's post that may be more clear for you:

OhioGal is the Attorney on this thread and who has advice you should follow ...Good Luck to You!!

 

[stealth2]

If spellcheck didn't catch that error, someone with a Masters degree should have!

Saw it, but couldn't be bothered...

 

[Just Blue]

If spellcheck didn't catch that error, someone with a Masters degree should have!

Yup****************************....

 

[Just Blue]

What error?

Here is a restatement of Blue's post that may be more clear for you:

OhioGal is the Attorney on this thread and who has advice you should follow ...Good Luck to You!!

Zig...I "think" Bali was talking about OP. If not? My very bad...

 

[Zigner]

Zig...I "think" Bali was talking about OP. If not? My very bad...

That makes more sense - you happened to get quoted and I assumed it was you that he was referring to. Oopsie.

 

[Just Blue]

That makes more sense - you happened to get quoted and I assumed it was you that he was referring to. Oopsie.

You are a sweetie!!

I actually looked it over twice 'cause I could not believe Bali was being nice to me!!

 

[Bali Hai]

You are a sweetie!!

I actually looked it over twice 'cause I could not believe Bali was being nice to me!!

Don't get used to it.

 

[Just Blue]

Don't get used to it.

Don't worry...I won't!!

 

[stealth2]

OhioGal is the Attorney on this thread and who's advice you should follow ...Good Luck to You!!

What error?

Here is a restatement of Blue's post that may be more clear for you:

OhioGal is the Attorney on this thread and who has advice you should follow ...Good Luck to You!!

Well, actually..... if one restates the quoted, "who's" does not translate to "who has", but, rather, "who is". So yes, the use of who's is incorrect - it should have been "whose". Of course, the post BM quoted used "advise" incorrectly, too.

Just sayin'.

 

[Zigner]

Well, actually..... if one restates the quoted, "who's" does not translate to "who has", but, rather, "who is". So yes, the use of who's is incorrect - it should have been "whose". Of course, the post BM quoted used "advise" incorrectly, too.

Just sayin'.

Who's can be a contraction of "who is" or "who has" - either is correct.