Good. I got you to read the policy.
I see two section that I think might relate
"we do not insure for loss caused directly or indirectly by any of the following. such loss is excluded regardless of any other cause of even contributing concurrently or in any sequence to the loss.
a ordinance of law, meaning enforcement of any ordinance or law regulating the use construction repair or demolition of a building or other structure, unless specifically provided under this policy.
That doesn't apply to your inspection program.
Where that comes in is when you rebuild or repair due to a covered loss and the local building code requires you to make code upgrades at an additional cost.
Your policy might or might not have coverage for code upgrades.
They also say something about concealment or fraud that involve in intentionally concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstances, does this fall into my category?
It might.
Examples:
1 - If, when you applied for the insurance, the application asked you if you participated in the inspection program and you answered yes, and then didn't participate and, at the time of the loss the insurance company found out that you lied on the application, your claim could be denied and the policy rescinded. The insurance company would have to show that participation in the inspection was material to the underwriting of your insurance. There are generally three ways to determine materiality. a - If you got a discount for participating in the inspection program, b - If the insurance company would not have written the policy without participation, c - If the insurance company would have limited coverage in some fashion without participation.
2 - If, at the time of the loss, you made false statement about anything that was material to the adjusting of the claim.
3 - And, the obvious example, if you committed (or had somebody commit) arson.
Otherwise, no, the insurance company would not deny a fire claim simply because you did not participate in the inspection program.
However, another issue is that an insurance company may be allowed to cancel or non-renew based on the condition of the property if the insurance company periodically inspects the property.
By the way, your "umbrella" policy has nothing to do with damage to your own property. Might want to read that one, too.