quincy
Senior Member
I posted a link to the Do Not Call Registry. The fine does not apply to debt collectors who are collecting on a legitimate debt.Do you have a link to the information that shows this? The OP is not the debtor...
I posted a link to the Do Not Call Registry. The fine does not apply to debt collectors who are collecting on a legitimate debt.Do you have a link to the information that shows this? The OP is not the debtor...
Right- as they believe they are. Also, these are not telemarketing calls. I do not believe that the Do Not Call Registry rules will provide much relief in this instance.I posted a link to the Do Not Call Registry. The fine does not apply to debt collectors who are collecting on a legitimate debt.
On the FTC site it says: "Companies that illegally call numbers on the Do Not Call Registry or place an illegal robocall can currently be fined up to $42,530 per call."Right- as they believe they are. Also, these are not telemarketing calls. I do not believe that the Do Not Call Registry rules will provide much relief in this instance.
I'm not convinced that this case would be handled by the FTC if a complaint were made, but it couldn't hurt. In any case, the OP seems to be getting somewhere with the company.On the FTC site it says: "Companies that illegally call numbers on the Do Not Call Registry or place an illegal robocall can currently be fined up to $42,530 per call."
The question here is if the rental company (or the collection agency representing the rental company) has been given adequate notice to stop the calls.
Anyone can sue anyone for anything, but you'd lose if you did this.Can I sue their company for harassment?
No one can intelligently predict the future in this way.OK so I won't win, but would it cause enough commoption to get them to stop calling?
No.Would they offer me a settlement to avoid the hassle
I agree. Filing an FTC complaint wouldn't hurt - although it doesn't appear a complaint will be necessary. The president of the company seemingly responsible for the calls appears to be working on it. That could be enough to stop the unwanted calls.I'm not convinced that this case would be handled by the FTC if a complaint were made, but it couldn't hurt. In any case, the OP seems to be getting somewhere with the company.
It is hard to rid yourself of a persistent debt collector, whether you are the debtor or not. At least there are a few ways now to help the victim of unwanted callers. Not perfect ways, of course.The law protects the deadbeat. The innocent bystander is screwed.
Not even very good ones. FTC complaints are wholly for statistical purposes until they rise to the levels of massive robocalling and then they might take some action. The police won't help in most cases. Most harassing call statutes require an actual intent to harass not just an aggressive attempt to contact someone.It is hard to rid yourself of a persistent debt collector, whether you are the debtor or not. At least there are a few ways now to help the victim of unwanted callers. Not perfect ways, of course.
Could you clarify please, doucar? Which industry?When I worked as counsel to the industry about 15 years ago, they ran into individuals who set up multiple phone lines and recorded multiple robo calls from the same companies and used them to sue the calling companies. After several back and forth and a few successful law suits, they began to "settle" these claims as a cost of business.
Thanks for answering my question, doucar. I wasn't sure if you were referring to the FTC or not.A company that used telemarketing for the bulk of its advertising.