What is the name of your state? FL
What are the elements needed to prove a frivolous lawsuit case? Malicious prosecution, abuse of process, etc?
I have a con-artist who had prior injuries who tried to fake a slip and fall, and I had an ambulance chasing attorney who fabricated things that were not true and even lied to the judge about the law.
His original personal injury attorney had enough sense to know it was absolute no case and refused to take it any further than a demand latter. He then got the most dishonest ambulance chasing attorney in the state of Florida, who gladly would fabricate a story which completely contradicted the first attorney's store.
He also abused the legal process to waste everyone time in endless depositions with people that knew nothing about the case and asking for a list of disgruntled ex-employees, harassing other customers, asking pointless questions design to embarrass and waste time. The law does not support this lawsuit, yet somehow it was dragged out for years and years without countless hours of deposition. I think he exceeded the number of people you were legally allowed to deposition in Florida. Also, it was not like he was finding out anything revolutionary, everyone just told him they don't know what he was talking about and not a single person could confirm anything they claimed. Some people were so detached from the situation they did not even remember the property in question.
Even when it was clear the whole thing was made up and the lie was caught, and he was found to lie about the law to say and even misquoted it and cutting off the piece that said he could not do that. He still said he needed to deposition more people. Some of his first questions were asking for more names of people to deposition.
Finally, this dismissed on summary judgment. Complaints to the bar association basically do nothing, right?
I would like to know if the law supports going after the ambulance chasing attorney and the professional slip-and-fall shake down artist for all the trouble they caused.
How much chicanery is acceptable as lawyers being lawyers, and where does it cross the line into something that is actionable in the form of a lawsuit for frivolous lawsuit, malicious prosecution and abuse of process, etc.?
Thanks.
What are the elements needed to prove a frivolous lawsuit case? Malicious prosecution, abuse of process, etc?
I have a con-artist who had prior injuries who tried to fake a slip and fall, and I had an ambulance chasing attorney who fabricated things that were not true and even lied to the judge about the law.
His original personal injury attorney had enough sense to know it was absolute no case and refused to take it any further than a demand latter. He then got the most dishonest ambulance chasing attorney in the state of Florida, who gladly would fabricate a story which completely contradicted the first attorney's store.
He also abused the legal process to waste everyone time in endless depositions with people that knew nothing about the case and asking for a list of disgruntled ex-employees, harassing other customers, asking pointless questions design to embarrass and waste time. The law does not support this lawsuit, yet somehow it was dragged out for years and years without countless hours of deposition. I think he exceeded the number of people you were legally allowed to deposition in Florida. Also, it was not like he was finding out anything revolutionary, everyone just told him they don't know what he was talking about and not a single person could confirm anything they claimed. Some people were so detached from the situation they did not even remember the property in question.
Even when it was clear the whole thing was made up and the lie was caught, and he was found to lie about the law to say and even misquoted it and cutting off the piece that said he could not do that. He still said he needed to deposition more people. Some of his first questions were asking for more names of people to deposition.
Finally, this dismissed on summary judgment. Complaints to the bar association basically do nothing, right?
I would like to know if the law supports going after the ambulance chasing attorney and the professional slip-and-fall shake down artist for all the trouble they caused.
How much chicanery is acceptable as lawyers being lawyers, and where does it cross the line into something that is actionable in the form of a lawsuit for frivolous lawsuit, malicious prosecution and abuse of process, etc.?
Thanks.
